← Search

Peggy Peloquin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Diego, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 5W–9L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history14 matches
L
2026-07-16 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray TC/ Snyder · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Hartman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray TC/ Snyder · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Snyder
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-25 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray TC/ Snyder · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelli Sandman-Hurley
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray TC/ Snyder · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelli Sandman-Hurley
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray TC/ Snyder · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-28 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray TC/ Snyder · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelli Sandman-Hurley
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-07-17 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray/ Hartman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Simpson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-10 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray/ Hartman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelli Sandman-Hurley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-26 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray/ Hartman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelli Sandman-Hurley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-12 · SD 7.0 Lake Murray/ Hartman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-05-21 · SD 3.5 Lake Murray TC (2:3)/ Hartman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Hartman
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-04-30 · SD 3.5 Lake Murray TC (2:3)/ Hartman · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 42.9% of games
7.0
30%
3W–7L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams