Teams

SFV - Paseo United Tri Mixed

2024 Mixed Tri-Level 18+ SFV Fall · SFV Mid Tri-Level Mixed 3.0-4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-16vs SFV - Parks & Wreck TrilevelLost 01
L#2 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Terry Wingo vs Sara Miller / Chencai Wang2-6, 2-6
2024-10-20vs SFV - Pure DriveWon 10
W#3 DoublesMathew Spiwak / Venita Ryan vs Mel Matibag / Tracy HASBANIAN6-2, 7-6
2024-10-19vs SFV LLW - Smash & Dash - Dan LulaLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Wingo / TANIA JANICEK vs Matthieu Corfmat / Diane Quan0-6, 4-6
2024-09-15vs SFV - Penn PalsLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrank Abt / Faith Abt vs Robby Marino / Meaghan Bedigian0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerry Wingo / TANIA JANICEK vs Nazar Makadsi / Cecilia Mikaelian1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Mid Tri-Level Mixed 3.0-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Chris Erickson
published 4
3.74
Patricia Dunn
published
3.62
James Ordway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Frank Abt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Mikhail Zeltser
published 3.5
3.31
Edward Hatch
published
3.26
TANIA JANICEK
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Patrick Tamondong
published
3.09
Gregory Straub
published
3.03
Terry Wingo
published
3.02
Venita Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Nicole Romanelli
published
2.87
Mathew Spiwak
published
Faith Abt
published
Harris Hall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TANIA JANICEK + Terry Wingo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Erickson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Patricia Dunn
22W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.74
4
James Ordway
86W–120L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Frank Abt
114W–63L career · 1 line in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Mikhail Zeltser
107W–80L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Edward Hatch
7W–21L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.31
3.5
TANIA JANICEK
102W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Patrick Tamondong
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Gregory Straub
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.09
Terry Wingo
8W–20L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Venita Ryan
128W–97L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Nicole Romanelli
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Mathew Spiwak
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
Faith Abt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Harris Hall
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.