Teams

GEPTA/Adult 3.0W/Cardenas/CCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 2.70 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-03vs GEPTA/Adult 3.0W/Bordier/EPTC#5Won 10
W#2 SinglesMegan Mcfadden vs Rocio Salazar6-3, 6-4
2025-05-06vs GEPTA/Adult 3.0W/Dominguez/EPTC#7Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMegan Mcfadden vs Christina Dominguez1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Carla Canales
usually #1 Singles 48%, also #2 Singles 24% · published 3
2.39
Carmen Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.38
Alison Leben
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 2.5
Carolina Machado
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Christina Mijares
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
Lorena Sosa
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Marisela Scott
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Megan Mcfadden
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Monica Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Patricia Contreras-Enloe
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Regina Porras
usually #1 Singles 52%, also #2 Singles 19% · published
Samantha Johnson
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Sara Acevedo
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Shannon Rhoads
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Stacy Mayo
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmen Cardenas + Lorena Sosa0830% games−16.7% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Shannon Rhoads22633% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Sosa + Stacy Mayo81644% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Mayo + Regina Porras2845% gamesnot enough data
Marisela Scott + Alison Leben6457% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Cardenas + Stacy Mayo0925% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Sosa + Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz0932% gamesnot enough data
Monica Ramirez + Alison Leben5455% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carla Canales
49W–56L career · 21 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
3
Carmen Cardenas
32W–115L career · type A · 31 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
2.5
Alison Leben
33W–31L career · 29 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Carolina Machado
8W–26L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Christina Mijares
11W–25L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Lorena Sosa
63W–114L career · 41 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
18W–68L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisela Scott
18W–28L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Mcfadden
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Ramirez
16W–60L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Contreras-Enloe
4W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Regina Porras
20W–44L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Johnson
19W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Acevedo
18W–57L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Rhoads
36W–89L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Mayo
47W–94L career · 46 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.