Teams

GEPTA/Adult 3.0W/Bordier/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 2.83 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-06-03vs GEPTA/Adult 3.0W/Cardenas/CCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Chavez / Marisa Porras vs Shannon Rhoads / Carmen Cardenas6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJulia Vera vs Regina Porras6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRocio Salazar vs Megan Mcfadden3-6, 4-6
2025-05-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRocio Salazar vs Rocio Veronica P Cortes1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-19vs GEPTA/Adult 3.0W/Martinez/EPTC#4Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Chavez / Iliana Lozano vs Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda / Roxana Luna6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRocio Salazar / Yadira Gonzalez vs Rebecca Vega Renteria / Fer Hernandez1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-12Split 11
L#1 DoublesIliana Lozano / Martha Chavez vs Ana Baca / Felisa Fuentes6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJulia Vera vs Erika Castaneda6-1, 6-1
2025-04-29Split 11
L#1 DoublesAraceli Solis / Martha Chavez vs Alison Krattiger / Jassivy Hernandez3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMonica Valenzuela / Rocio Salazar vs Ruthann Ordaz / Corinne Shepherd6-1, 6-1
2025-04-22Split 11
W#1 SinglesJulia Vera vs Adriana Acosta6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRocio Salazar vs Michelle Smith6-7, 4-6
2025-04-15Won 20
W#1 SinglesJulia Vera vs Lilly Gutierrez Molina6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAraceli Solis / Martha Chavez vs Sonia Ramirez / Gabriela Navarro6-2, 6-2
2025-04-08Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Chavez / Iliana Lozano vs Veronica Gonzalez / Lorena Chavez6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRocio Salazar vs Edina Salazar1-6, 5-7
2025-04-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesJulia Vera vs Rachel Stevens6-0, 6-1
2025-03-31vs GEPTA/Adult 3.0W/Delgado/EPTC#3Won 21
L#1 DoublesRosario Samaniego / Rocio Salazar vs Camila Olmos / Cristal Alvarez1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJulia Vera vs Daniela Sanchez6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAraceli Solis / Martha Chavez vs Brenda Rodriguez / Myrna Dominguez6-4, 6-4
2025-03-25Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJulia Vera vs Cristina da Costa6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMonica Valenzuela / Rocio Salazar vs Yuri Caire / Gloria King5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMartha Chavez vs Ariana Dominguez2-6, 4-6
2025-03-12vs GEPTA/Adult 3.0W/Dominguez/EPTC#7Won 20
W#1 SinglesJulia Vera vs Becca Mcbroom4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRosario Samaniego / Rocio Salazar vs Christina Dominguez / Alejandra Beltran6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Araceli Solis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
Iliana Lozano
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.37
Claudia Ponce
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published 2.5
Julia Vera
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
Luisa Franco
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mariel Rubio
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Martha Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Michelle Bordier
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Monica Valenzuela
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Rocio Salazar
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Rosario Samaniego
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Teyali Provencio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Viviana Marquez
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published
Yadira Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Bordier + Luisa Franco15560% gamesnot enough data
Martha Chavez + Araceli Solis4357% gamesnot enough data
Yadira Gonzalez + Claudia Ponce1434% gamesnot enough data
Rosario Samaniego + Araceli Solis0538% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Bordier + Rosario Samaniego314 matchesnot enough data
Martha Chavez + Iliana Lozano033 matchesnot enough data
Rosario Samaniego + Claudia Ponce213 matchesnot enough data
Viviana Marquez + Claudia Ponce033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Araceli Solis
10W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Iliana Lozano
7W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Claudia Ponce
22W–17L career · 19 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.37
Julia Vera
22W–5L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luisa Franco
27W–12L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariel Rubio
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Chavez
19W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Bordier
29W–10L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Valenzuela
18W–10L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rocio Salazar
11W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosario Samaniego
15W–15L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teyali Provencio
5W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Viviana Marquez
17W–18L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yadira Gonzalez
25W–23L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.