Teams

CACM RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs CM PINKWon 31
L#1 DoublesStephanie Kamlet / Mary Deluccia vs Melissa Manassee / Cindy Sawyer3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Heine vs Taylor Pardun5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEliza Nolte / Patricia Olson vs Katie McCrimmon / Angela Dellasalle6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPeggy Andersen / Denise Geiger vs Holly Flannigan / Sue Presta6-3, 6-2
2021-07-19vs DTC PURPLESplit 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Jensik / Patricia Olson vs Jeannie Crawford / Kathleen Andrews4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMelissa Heine vs Teri Smith6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEliza Nolte / Maricris Doolan vs Julie Underdahl / Ethel McGlynn3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Geiger / Peggy Andersen vs Jody Hunnicutt / Susan Nakano4-6, 4-6
2021-07-15vs WP BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesPatricia Olson / Sarah Jensik vs Kris Staaf-Bendixen / Barbara Deboer6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMelissa Heine vs Geetha Sivanandam6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaricris Doolan / Mary Deluccia vs Wendy Glazer / Teresa Alleman6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDenise Geiger / Margaret Allon vs Nichol Weizenbeck / Migdalia Morillo Rettig4-6, 1-6
2021-07-08vs MC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSarah Jensik / Mary Deluccia vs Debra Kuebler / Julie Gall6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPeggy Andersen vs Margaret Kuhn6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMargaret Allon / Stephanie Kamlet vs Tracy Adreon / Molly Balmes7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEliza Nolte / Maricris Doolan vs Jessica Cunningham / Janet Marks6-3, 7-5
2021-06-24vs STAP REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesStephanie Kamlet / Melissa Heine vs Kimberly Miller / KERRY HANSON6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesPeggy Andersen vs Somin Lee6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Allon / Denise Geiger vs Ann Lassiter / Sarah Crawford3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEliza Nolte / Mary Deluccia vs Molly Garg / Danielle Remington6-1, 6-0
2021-06-17vs NJ BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Geiger / Sarah Jensik vs Verhonica Hirst / Tracie Cordeiro0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Heine vs Irina Schwarzburg7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMargaret Allon / Mary Deluccia vs Natasha Uecker / Suzanne Watkins4-6, 6-7
2021-06-10vs GTC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPeggy Andersen / Maricris Doolan vs Andrea Evashevski / Shama Patwardhan2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPatricia Olson vs Molly Leamon7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Deluccia / Denise Geiger vs Kelly Nordini / Kathleen Stolle6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Kamlet / Sarah Jensik vs Julie Goldberg / Jill Orsatti6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Sarah Jensik
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Maricris Doolan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Patricia Olson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.27
Melissa Heine
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Mary Deluccia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Jodi Brown
published
2.63
Denise Geiger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Margaret Allon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Peggy Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Stephanie Kamlet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maricris Doolan + Patricia Olson4155% games+5.9% vs expected
Jodi Brown + Maricris Doolan4253% games−1.4% vs expected
Sarah Jensik + Patricia Olson121850% games−2.4% vs expected
Mary Deluccia + Peggy Andersen2350% games−4.5% vs expected
Mary Deluccia + Stephanie Kamlet213 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Brown + Patricia Olson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sarah Jensik
129W–88L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Maricris Doolan
27W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Patricia Olson
56W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Melissa Heine
22W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Mary Deluccia
149W–104L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Jodi Brown
42W–48L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Denise Geiger
32W–59L career · 6 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
Margaret Allon
5W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Peggy Andersen
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Kamlet
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.