Teams

DTC PURPLE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-25vs STAP REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesKaren Polzin / Julie Underdahl vs Somin Lee / Kim Foster3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJann Peterson vs Sonya Watts6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeannie Crawford / Kathleen Andrews vs Ann Lassiter / Lane Parker6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLiz Donahue / Susan Nakano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-19vs CACM REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJeannie Crawford / Kathleen Andrews vs Sarah Jensik / Patricia Olson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTeri Smith vs Melissa Heine3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Underdahl / Ethel McGlynn vs Eliza Nolte / Maricris Doolan3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Susan Nakano vs Denise Geiger / Peggy Andersen6-4, 6-4
2021-07-15vs NJ BLACKLost 13
L#1 DoublesJulie Underdahl / Liz Donahue vs Rachel Price / Verhonica Hirst6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTeri Smith vs Suzanne Watkins4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Polzin / Kathleen Andrews vs Colleen McClary / Leah Vladika6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Susan Nakano vs Patti Poole / Rebecca Strobel1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-08vs GTC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Karen Polzin vs Theress Pidick / Shama Patwardhan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTeri Smith vs Kelly Nordini3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaura Spangler / Susan Nakano vs Andrea Evashevski / MacAyla Hansen6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJann Peterson / Jeannie Crawford vs Catherine Hance / Jill Orsatti6-1, 6-2
2021-06-24vs WP BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Karen Polzin vs Wendy Glazer / Teresa Alleman6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJulie Underdahl vs Chrysie Ready7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEthel McGlynn / Liz Donahue vs Nichol Weizenbeck / Barbara Deboer6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeannie Crawford / Kathleen Andrews vs Sarah Gilbert / Serena Sampat6-1, 6-1
2021-06-17vs MC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Jeannie Crawford vs Ursula Hamel / Margaret Kuhn2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesTeri Smith vs Jessica Cunningham2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEthel McGlynn / Liz Donahue vs Amy Coddington / Tracy Adreon4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Nakano / Jann Peterson vs Brenda McDonald / Janet Marks6-3, 6-1
2021-06-10vs CM PINKSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEthel McGlynn / Liz Donahue vs Brooke O'Drobinak / Cindy Sawyer6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTeri Smith vs Taylor Pardun0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Nakano / Maura Spangler vs Margaret Deline / Cathy Roper6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJann Peterson / Julie Underdahl vs Angela Dellasalle / Kristi Keil3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Maura Spangler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Jody Hunnicutt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Ethel McGlynn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Liz Donahue
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Julie Underdahl
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.11
Jann Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Nakano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.80
Teri Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jeannie Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Polzin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kathleen Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Valeria Alberola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannie Crawford + Kathleen Andrews13264% games+6.3% vs expected
Maura Spangler + Jann Peterson6259% games+3.5% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Karen Polzin12556% games+1.3% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Jann Peterson171058% games+1.2% vs expected
Liz Donahue + Ethel McGlynn221955% games+0.9% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Jann Peterson5356% games+0.9% vs expected
Julie Underdahl + Jann Peterson2548% games−0.1% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Julie Underdahl6552% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maura Spangler
49W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Jody Hunnicutt
109W–80L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Ethel McGlynn
45W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Liz Donahue
45W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Julie Underdahl
53W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%9%91%
3.17
3.5
Jann Peterson
51W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Susan Nakano
57W–68L career · 6 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.00
Teri Smith
36W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
Jeannie Crawford
21W–3L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Polzin
33W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Andrews
39W–17L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Valeria Alberola
2W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.