Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W PM

16 players · average NTRP 2.94 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-28vs SunPro-Reoch/MurraySplit 11
W#1 SinglesNooshin Prasthofer vs Emily Lillywhite6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLisa Pappas / Heather Smartt vs Tina Taylor / Jennifer Nielsen6-7, 3-6
2025-07-21vs Wasatch Hills - Volley LlamasLost 12
W#1 DoublesHeather Smartt / Porsche Gardner vs Laura Espinosa / Jennifer Kawakami6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Pappas / KayeLynn BASTIAN vs Linda Lasater / Lori Heimuli4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Russo / Danielle Lafata vs Katie Murphy / Wendy Hopkins2-6, 0-6
2025-07-14vs Liberty Park-KeslerWon 31
L#1 DoublesJoann Kuncewitch / Heather Smartt vs Rebecca Myers / Jamie Harris1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNooshin Prasthofer vs Isabel Cristina Lau6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCari Johnson / Lisa Pappas vs Bernadette Muniz / LISA PERMENTER6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaureen Russo / Shannon Halverson vs Sandy Weeks / Wendy Conrad6-3, 7-6
2025-07-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesCari Johnson / Lisa Pappas vs Kristin Rocke / Kylee Bryson6-1, 6-2
2025-06-30vs Salt Lake Tennis-Court QueensSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRebecca Harman / Shannon Halverson vs Elaine Day / Paula Gause6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMaureen Russo / Danielle Lafata vs Nicole Leatham / Megan Pierce6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-28vs Cottonwood Club-BarberWon 20
W#1 SinglesNooshin Prasthofer vs Tam Pham1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDelia Bayna / Shannon Halverson vs Kylee Bryson / Kristin Hutchins6-1, 6-3
2025-06-23vs Park City MARC-JacobsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKalaiselvi Seetharaman / Joann Kuncewitch vs Lynette Maloney / Melanie Schlachter2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Jamie Sorensen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Heather Smartt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Jennifer Wily
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.86
Shannon Halverson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Rebecca Harman
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.84
Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Cari Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.73
Porsche Gardner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Maureen Russo
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.61
Lisa Pappas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Andy Andersen
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 19% · published 3
2.48
Joann Kuncewitch
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Danielle Lafata
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Nooshin Prasthofer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Johnson + Lisa Pappas5259% games+4.8% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Delia Bayna2738% games+2.3% vs expected
Jennifer Wily + Delia Bayna14554% games+1.7% vs expected
Cari Johnson + Rebecca Harman4357% games−0.0% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Lisa Pappas2348% games−0.5% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Shannon Halverson2448% games−1.7% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + KayeLynn BASTIAN192450% games−3.6% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Kalaiselvi Seetharaman5353% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jamie Sorensen
78W–102L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Heather Smartt
65W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Jennifer Wily
119W–177L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Shannon Halverson
25W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Rebecca Harman
244W–303L career · 18 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
82W–91L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Cari Johnson
42W–75L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Porsche Gardner
33W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Maureen Russo
40W–75L career · 17 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 9 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 10 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Lisa Pappas
30W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
Andy Andersen
12W–46L career · 16 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Joann Kuncewitch
15W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Danielle Lafata
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer
98W–124L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.