Teams

Liberty Park-Kesler

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.11 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-04vs Cottonwood Club-BarberWon 10
W#1 DoublesBernadette Muniz / Kyoko Jensen vs Stephanie Gelman / Magdalena Kovacsovics6-2, 6-1
2025-07-28vs Salt Lake Tennis-Court QueensLost 01
L#2 DoublesKyoko Jensen / Sandy Weeks vs Nancy Matz / Elaine Day6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-21vs Park City MARC-JacobsLost 01
L#2 DoublesIsabel Cristina Lau / Wendy Conrad vs Lynette Maloney / Melanie Schlachter3-6, 1-6
2025-07-14vs Salt Lake Tennis-BaynaLost 03
L#1 SinglesIsabel Cristina Lau vs Nooshin Prasthofer4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBernadette Muniz / LISA PERMENTER vs Cari Johnson / Lisa Pappas7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandy Weeks / Wendy Conrad vs Maureen Russo / Shannon Halverson3-6, 6-7
2025-06-30vs Wasatch Hills - Volley LlamasWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlisa Kesler / Bernadette Muniz vs Mary Sorensen / Katie Murphy6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLISA PERMENTER / Wendy Conrad vs Lynn Hepperly / Krisann Humphreys6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandy Weeks / Becky Fajardo vs Shelly Kaihatu / Trena Anderson6-1, 6-1
2025-06-28vs SunPro-Reoch/MurrayWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandy Weeks / Jennifer Madison vs Carrie Jensen / Karen Murray7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLISA PERMENTER / Wendy Conrad vs Megumi Matsuzawa / Emily Lillywhite7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBernadette Muniz / Ashley Taylor vs Marilyn Patch / Nicole Collins6-0, 6-0
2025-06-16vs Cottonwood Club-BarberWon 20
W#2 DoublesSandy Weeks / Jamie Harris vs Holly Ricker / Mary Diaz Gordon5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLISA PERMENTER / Wendy Conrad vs Stephanie Gelman / Kristin Hutchins7-5, 6-1
2025-06-09vs Salt Lake Tennis-Court QueensWon 10
W#3 DoublesLISA PERMENTER / Wendy Conrad vs Megan Pierce / Staci Dansie6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Rebecca Myers
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
3.08
Jennifer Madison
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
3.08
Ashley Taylor
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.06
Bernadette Muniz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Kyoko Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.97
Alisa Kesler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.95
Becky Fajardo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Wendy Conrad
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Paulette Santiago
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Megan Mullins
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Isabel Cristina Lau
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Sandy Weeks
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.56
LISA PERMENTER
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jamie Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernadette Muniz + Kyoko Jensen7262% games+6.9% vs expected
Becky Fajardo + Paulette Santiago8452% games+4.5% vs expected
LISA PERMENTER + Wendy Conrad6060% games+4.5% vs expected
Bernadette Muniz + Wendy Conrad5351% games+3.5% vs expected
Jennifer Madison + Wendy Conrad3250% games+3.1% vs expected
Kyoko Jensen + Sandy Weeks3455% games+1.6% vs expected
Megan Mullins + Paulette Santiago12951% games+0.4% vs expected
Kyoko Jensen + Ashley Taylor3550% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Myers
110W–41L career · 18 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Jennifer Madison
63W–54L career · 11 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Ashley Taylor
68W–44L career · type A · 13 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Bernadette Muniz
85W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Kyoko Jensen
102W–118L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Alisa Kesler
69W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Becky Fajardo
54W–29L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Wendy Conrad
97W–94L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Paulette Santiago
60W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Megan Mullins
44W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Isabel Cristina Lau
49W–93L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Sandy Weeks
67W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
LISA PERMENTER
72W–124L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Jamie Harris
21W–71L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.