Teams

Team 5

2023 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over Fall · NOVA Tri Level Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-12vs Team 6 The WarriorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesSean Klinge / Weiling Tan vs Ivan Kozliak / Jonathan Ramseur6-3, 6-3
2023-10-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesTommy Hyres / Brian Partlow vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-05vs Team 4Won 10
W#2 DoublesSean Klinge / Blake Taylor vs Louis Dupuis / Jeff Ross6-3, 6-3
2023-09-21vs Team 7 Triple ForceWon 10
W#2 DoublesDevarshi Bhatt / Sean Klinge vs Joe Napolitano / Oron Strauss6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri Level Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Thomas Cyrnak
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.34
4.08
3.88
Brian Partlow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Mike Metzger
published
Devarshi Bhatt
published 4
JANAK MEHTA
published 4
3.51
Sanjivan Sivapiragasam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Tommy Hyres
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Randy Lee
published
3.32
Sean Klinge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Sunil Bedakihal
published
3.18
Frank Pan
published 3.5
3.12
Weiling Tan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Partlow + Vijeaswaran Velusamy8071% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Thomas Cyrnak
311W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.54
4.5
Vijeaswaran Velusamy
206W–82L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Jagannath Chakravarty
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
4
Brian Partlow
104W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
Mike Metzger
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Devarshi Bhatt
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
JANAK MEHTA
34W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Sanjivan Sivapiragasam
86W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Tommy Hyres
59W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Randy Lee
15W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Sean Klinge
79W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Sunil Bedakihal
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Frank Pan
3W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Natee Wongsangpaiboon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Weiling Tan
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.