Teams

Pierson 40+

2025 South East Tennis Singles 40 & Over League · 3.0 Women 40 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-03vs MacLeanWon 30
W#1 SinglesTracy Pierson vs Heather Martin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAlisa Cowan vs Alice Weiser6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHolly Dameron vs Liz Moysey6-0, 6-1
2025-03-02vs RussellSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLeigh Burris vs Alicia Rineer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTracy Pierson vs Kara Gansmann6-7, 4-6
2025-02-27vs Drennan/MaloneWon 30
W#1 SinglesLeigh Burris vs Patricia Furbay6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMeredith Hampton vs Alison Arnold6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAlisa Cowan vs Jessica Holleman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-10vs Drennan/MaloneWon 21
L#1 SinglesKelly Cole vs Patricia Furbay3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesLeigh Burris vs Faye Serkin6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHolly Dameron vs Leslie Houston6-1, 6-1
2025-02-06vs McCainWon 30
W#1 SinglesTracy Pierson vs Jennifer Pennington7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKelly Cole vs Pamela Vest6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMeredith Hampton vs Sandra Cerra6-2, 6-1
2025-02-05vs McCainWon 20
W#2 SinglesHolly Dameron vs Jennifer Pennington6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMeredith Hampton vs Sandra Cerra6-3, 6-0
2025-01-31vs RussellWon 21
L#1 SinglesAlisa Cowan vs Alicia Rineer0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHolly Dameron vs Rachel Mclean6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKelly Cole vs Julie Wells6-3, 6-1
2025-01-30vs MacLeanWon 30
W#1 SinglesMeredith Hampton vs Alice Weiser7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTracy Pierson vs Penelope Taylor6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHolly Dameron vs Jennifer McCall6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Leigh Burris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.21
Holly Dameron
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Kelly Cole
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.95
Alisa Cowan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.94
Tracy Pierson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.75
Meredith Hampton
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Burris + Tracy Pierson213 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Pierson + Alisa Cowan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Burris
53W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Holly Dameron
33W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Kelly Cole
50W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Alisa Cowan
53W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
Tracy Pierson
41W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
Meredith Hampton
13W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.