Teams

Russell

2025 South East Tennis Singles 40 & Over League · 3.0 Women 40 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-04vs McCainSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlicia Rineer vs Jennifer Bradstreet6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesShannon Russell vs Jennifer Pennington3-6, 6-7
2025-03-02vs Pierson 40+Split 11
L#1 SinglesAlicia Rineer vs Leigh Burris2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKara Gansmann vs Tracy Pierson7-6, 6-4
2025-03-01vs Drennan/MaloneLost 12
L#1 SinglesKatie Ragan vs Karen Galey1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKara Gansmann vs Leslie Houston3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesElizabeth McKinley vs Larissa Malone6-0, 6-2
2025-03-01vs McCainLost 03
L#1 SinglesShannon Russell vs Tricia McCain6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRachel Mclean vs Jennifer Pennington4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKara Gansmann vs Pamela Vest6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-06vs Weaver 40+Split 11
L#1 SinglesRachel Mclean vs Ann Weaver3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlicia Rineer vs Pamela Dieffenbauch6-4, 6-4
2025-01-31vs Pierson 40+Lost 12
W#1 SinglesAlicia Rineer vs Alisa Cowan6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRachel Mclean vs Holly Dameron1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJulie Wells vs Kelly Cole3-6, 1-6
2025-01-30vs Drennan/MaloneWon 21
L#1 SinglesKatie Ragan vs Patricia Furbay0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJulie Wells vs Alison Arnold6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesElizabeth McKinley vs Catherine Gill6-1, 6-0
2025-01-29vs Weaver 40+Lost 03
L#1 SinglesShannon Russell vs Ann Weaver3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKara Gansmann vs Pamela Dieffenbauch1-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesKatie Ragan vs Hannah Bodemann2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Alicia Rineer
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
3.12
Elizabeth McKinley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Shannon Russell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.63
Kara Gansmann
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.54
Julie Wells
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.53
Katie Ragan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.25
Rachel Mclean
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth McKinley + Katie Ragan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alicia Rineer
38W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Elizabeth McKinley
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
Shannon Russell
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kara Gansmann
19W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Julie Wells
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Katie Ragan
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Rachel Mclean
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.