Teams

GAC NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs HW BLUESplit 11
L#1 SinglesMarcus McAskin vs Brent Lenderman6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick Reed / Martin Rankin vs Lane Cutter / Eric Ginsberg6-4, 6-4
2024-05-22vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesMarcus McAskin vs Duane Cagle6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDimitri Kaufman / Patrick Reed vs Charles Schott / Daniel Purdum5-7, 3-6
2024-05-15vs LTFC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatrick Reed / Terry Rigo vs Simon Payne / Nam Luu2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMarcus McAskin vs Firmin GorraDiallo6-4, 7-5
2024-05-08vs SS-H GREYWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartin Rankin / James Scheper vs Monte Sutton / William Johns6-2, 6-3
2024-05-01vs KC-CC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartin Rankin / Terry Rigo vs Ryan Logsdon / James Baraglia0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMarcus McAskin vs Sadler Merrill1-6, 1-6
2024-04-24vs HW BLUELost 02
L#1 SinglesMarcus McAskin vs Andy Silverman3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Barney / Patrick Reed vs Mark Superka / Kelly Bolin6-7, 4-6
2024-04-17vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesMarcus McAskin vs Duane Cagle6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMartin Rankin / Michael Barney vs Kyle Hillman / Mitchell Werden7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Martin Rankin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Michael Mauro
published
3.75
Michael Barney
published
3.72
Marcus McAskin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.61
Patrick Reed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Dimitri Kaufman
published 3.5
James Scheper
published
Jerry Maglio
published
Terry Rigo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Reed + Martin Rankin151854% games+0.2% vs expected
Patrick Reed + Marcus McAskin224 matchesnot enough data
Marcus McAskin + Martin Rankin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Martin Rankin
55W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Michael Mauro
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.78
Michael Barney
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Marcus McAskin
30W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Patrick Reed
58W–138L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Dimitri Kaufman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
James Scheper
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jerry Maglio
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Rigo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.