Teams

SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 18AW4.0B

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

25 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Stephanie Keller
published
4.00
Anja Brau
published 4.5
3.94
Sarah Speakman
published
3.93
Yukari Seki
published
3.92
Amy Sendil
published 4.5
3.88
Carolyn Arkin
published 4
3.87
May Wang
published
3.86
Elizabeth Wolfe
published
3.86
Emily Ling
published
3.85
Privina Sexton
published
3.84
Cori Mehring
published 4
3.83
Sofia Yoshimoto
published
3.81
Kristina Weaver
published
3.77
Uzma Makhdumi
published
3.65
Maya Grosul
published
3.62
Leyla Scott
published
3.62
Jennifer Skarakis
published
3.61
Nancy Miyasaki
published
3.57
Sumin Elarde
published
3.53
Maria Vegas
published
3.49
Jiyun Hong
published
3.42
Jennifer Freedman
published
3.39
Ashi Labouisse
published 3.5
3.34
Lora Saarnio
published
Junko Bice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Wolfe + Jennifer Skarakis3248% games−4.5% vs expected
Nancy Miyasaki + Ashi Labouisse4176% gamesnot enough data
Emily Ling + Jiyun Hong213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Keller
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Anja Brau
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
4.00
Sarah Speakman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.94
Yukari Seki
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.93
4.5
Amy Sendil
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Carolyn Arkin
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
May Wang
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
Elizabeth Wolfe
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
Emily Ling
42W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
Privina Sexton
40W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.85
4
Cori Mehring
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
Sofia Yoshimoto
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Kristina Weaver
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Uzma Makhdumi
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Maya Grosul
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.65
Leyla Scott
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Jennifer Skarakis
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.62
Nancy Miyasaki
35W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
Sumin Elarde
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Maria Vegas
27W–36L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jiyun Hong
18W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
Jennifer Freedman
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.42
3.5
Ashi Labouisse
20W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Lora Saarnio
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.34
Junko Bice
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.