Teams

Lahey/Nashville

2026 Combo 40 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Women - WED AM

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 9 6:30 PM
Vanderbilt University
Sep 16 6:00 PM
Tennis Complex at Maryland Farms
2026-08-26vs Walker/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesHollie Williams / Suzanne Spalding vs Elizabeth Csernovicz / Jessica Lester6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Lahey / Maura Fitzgerald vs Cynthia Walker / Claire Bailey6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVicki Phillips / Rebecca Sara Cook vs Dawn Cole / Joy Murphey3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-08-21vs Blevins/Thomas/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaura Fitzgerald / Thalia Kahl vs Mollie Alvarez / Ellen Gooden6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Cox / Mary Carkhuff vs Heather Brandon / Melissa Goldberg4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristina Rogers / Kelly Bennie vs Julie Lavigne / Anne Jetton5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-18vs Davis/Neal/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesHollie Williams / Rebecca Sara Cook vs Eileen Smith / Kathy Anderson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThalia Kahl / Maura Fitzgerald vs Marjorie George / Lisa Wallace6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStefani Sandow / Lynn Strevell vs Erin Neal / Elizabeth Davis2-6, 0-6
2026-08-05vs Kumar/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Cox / Kristi Broome vs Nina Kumar / Lauren Wideman6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaura Fitzgerald / Susan Lahey vs Tammy Shrivalle / Marian Vangeli6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristina Rogers / Suzanne Spalding vs Suzanne Parker Hazlett / Jenny Neeley6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Allison McNeely
published 4
3.68
Suzanne Cox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Maura Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Chantel Wujtow
published 4
3.59
Hollie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Thalia Kahl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Kelly Bennie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Suzanne Spalding
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Kristina Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Rebecca Sara Cook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Mary Carkhuff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Lynn Strevell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Susan Lahey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Kristi Broome
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Vicki Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Stefani Sandow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hollie Williams + Suzanne Spalding4154% games+11.7% vs expected
Susan Lahey + Rebecca Sara Cook1544% games+0.1% vs expected
Allison McNeely + Maura Fitzgerald3252% games+0.0% vs expected
Chantel Wujtow + Hollie Williams033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Lahey + Maura Fitzgerald213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison McNeely
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Suzanne Cox
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.68
Maura Fitzgerald
17W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Chantel Wujtow
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Hollie Williams
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Thalia Kahl
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kelly Bennie
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Suzanne Spalding
36W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Kristina Rogers
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Rebecca Sara Cook
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Mary Carkhuff
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Lynn Strevell
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Susan Lahey
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Kristi Broome
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Vicki Phillips
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Stefani Sandow
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.