Teams

Kumar/Nashville

2026 Combo 40 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Women - WED AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 9 6:30 PM
Vanderbilt University
2026-09-02vs Walker/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Protz / Tammy Shrivalle vs Rachel Fogarty / Jessica Lester3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJenny Neeley / Suzanne Parker Hazlett vs Elizabeth Csernovicz / Joy Murphey3-6, 2-6
2026-08-26vs Davis/Neal/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynn Blocher / Claudia Paz vs Lisa Wallace / Joy Cox2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Neighbors / Stephanie Protz vs Marjorie George / Eileen Smith3-6, 3-6
2026-08-19vs Blevins/Thomas/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynn Blocher / Claudia Paz vs Brenda Eckhart / Patricia Frawley3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJenny Neeley / Mary Fetherling vs Jennifer Knight / Kelly Clapp6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarian Vangeli / Rene Fields vs Heather Brandon / Mary Mouser1-6, 4-6
2026-08-05vs Lahey/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Parker Hazlett / Jenny Neeley vs Kristina Rogers / Suzanne Spalding3-6, 3-6
2026-07-29vs Davis/Neal/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynn Blocher / Claudia Paz vs Lisa Wallace / Jill Porter6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Lauren Wideman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Mary Fetherling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Suzanne Parker Hazlett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Nina Kumar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Susan Manley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Tammy Shrivalle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Marian Vangeli
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Claudia Paz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Rene Fields
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Lynn Blocher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Elizabeth Neighbors
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Jenny Neeley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.13
Sonja Plumlee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Jennifer Roh
published
2.97
Stephanie Protz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Elisa Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Paz + Lynn Blocher8453% games+5.3% vs expected
Lauren Wideman + Nina Kumar11653% games+4.8% vs expected
Sonja Plumlee + Lauren Wideman5648% games+2.9% vs expected
Mary Fetherling + Jennifer Roh4160% games+1.1% vs expected
Tammy Shrivalle + Marian Vangeli2448% games−0.2% vs expected
Marian Vangeli + Susan Manley4945% games−4.7% vs expected
Sonja Plumlee + Nina Kumar41140% games−6.2% vs expected
Tammy Shrivalle + Susan Manley2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Wideman
27W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Mary Fetherling
20W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Suzanne Parker Hazlett
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Nina Kumar
36W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Susan Manley
26W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Tammy Shrivalle
43W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Marian Vangeli
19W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Claudia Paz
25W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Rene Fields
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Lynn Blocher
32W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
Elizabeth Neighbors
56W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jenny Neeley
16W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sonja Plumlee
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jennifer Roh
12W–11L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Stephanie Protz
29W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Elisa Hill
25W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.