Teams

TOB/Chambers

2025 COTA USTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Womens Day 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs ATC Gattiker Wednesday 7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKay Forrest / Phyllis Chambers vs Taylor Alexander / Julie Spivey6-3, 0-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKeri Kimbrell / Ashley Talbot vs Trina Butts / Lisa Bowen4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRachel KREIGHBAUM / Candice Nash vs Angela Alexander / Teresa Gattiker6-7, 7-6, 4-6
2025-07-30vs MCTC/Kerns ComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesKeri Kimbrell / Candice Nash vs Kathy Elliott / JennyLynn Perman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Grimes / Eileen Kemp vs Candace Crenshaw / Caroline Hobson6-2, 2-6, 2-6
2025-07-16vs ATC Gattiker Wednesday 7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Smosny / Dawn Maddox vs Deborah Barany / Sydney Felker3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Dunning / Rachel KREIGHBAUM vs Trina Butts / Sonya Peacock1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBeth Grimes / Kristine Ewing vs Amanda Patterson / Melissa Harshman2-6, 1-6
2025-07-09vs MCTC/Kerns ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Smosny / Ashley Talbot vs Starla Pellegrino / Mary Rector3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhyllis Chambers / Beth Grimes vs Caroline O'Neal / Heather Cunningham2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCandice Nash / Carrie Shay vs Caroline Hobson / Candace Crenshaw2-6, 1-6
2025-06-18vs ATC Gattiker Wednesday 7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKay Forrest / Phyllis Chambers vs Taylor Alexander / Julie Spivey5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Maddox / Candice Nash vs Coreen Delamater / Sydney Felker1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Grimes / Eileen Kemp vs Jessica Muilenburg / Teresa Gattiker6-2, 2-6, 0-6
2025-06-11vs MCTC/Kerns ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeri Kimbrell / Amie Botts vs Mary Rector / Starla Pellegrino1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Jones / Phyllis Chambers vs Caroline O'Neal / Candace Crenshaw2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Abernathy / Dawn Maddox vs Caroline Hobson / JennyLynn Perman6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Womens Day 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ATC Gattiker Wednesday 7.5601716104
2MCTC/Kerns Combo3381022162
3TOB/Chambers0621633228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Kay Forrest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Tina Smosny
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Phyllis Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Ashley Talbot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Rachel KREIGHBAUM
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Amie Botts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Candice Nash
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Eileen Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Keri Kimbrell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Lindsey Dunning
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carrie Shay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dawn Maddox
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kellie Coulter
published
Kristine Ewing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Abernathy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Peterson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candice Nash + Carrie Shay134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kay Forrest
35W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
Tina Smosny
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.38
Phyllis Chambers
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Ashley Talbot
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
Rachel KREIGHBAUM
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Amie Botts
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Candice Nash
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Eileen Kemp
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Keri Kimbrell
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Lindsey Dunning
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Carrie Shay
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Dawn Maddox
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kellie Coulter
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Ewing
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Abernathy
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Peterson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.