Teams

SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AW4.0A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.07 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesChamane Ifland vs Tracy Sanders6-4, 6-4
2022-03-13vs DIAMOND HILLS 40AW4.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesChamane Ifland / Jennifer Vice vs Kelly Chance / Myra Auer6-3, 6-3
2022-03-10vs ROUND HILL CC 40AW4.0BWon 10
W#3 DoublesChamane Ifland / Valerie Blanchard vs Marci Dublin / Kasey Snellgrove6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChamane Ifland / Darci Nunes vs Deanna Fong / Thuy Nguyen4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-02-12vs DIAMOND HILLS 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 SinglesChamane Ifland vs Marie Calderon4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Chandra Thomas
published 4.5
4.15
Angelita Vallejo
published 4.5
3.99
Jennifer Vice
published
3.96
Ava Ascher
published 4
3.70
Olga Regal
published
3.70
Lynn Ventura
published
3.69
Laura Manelia
published
3.59
JoAnn Clark
published
3.53
Darci Nunes
published 4
3.44
Chamane Ifland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Gina Chen
published 4
3.40
Monica Ravanello
published
3.30
Anne Thurston
published 3.5
3.21
Lory Morar
published
Valerie Blanchard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelita Vallejo + Chandra Thomas7165% games−1.1% vs expected
Laura Manelia + Ava Ascher224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chandra Thomas
27W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Angelita Vallejo
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Jennifer Vice
15W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Ava Ascher
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Olga Regal
28W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Lynn Ventura
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Laura Manelia
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
JoAnn Clark
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Darci Nunes
9W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Chamane Ifland
107W–54L career · 9 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Gina Chen
27W–19L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.43
Monica Ravanello
26W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Anne Thurston
25W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Lory Morar
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Valerie Blanchard
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.