Teams

S OR-RVCC-Kelly

2024 ADULT 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-18vs ESTC-MohlerSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNora Knox / Victoria Sheadel vs Bobbi Kearney / Kristina Parker6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJanel Hahn vs Jody Rolnick0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMartha Kelly / Heather Bartlett vs Aubree Nash / Tami Calkin1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDana Yearsley / Joanne Beckett vs Brenda Nulty / Jennifer Ewert6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-18vs ACB-MasseySplit 22
W#1 DoublesNora Knox / Victoria Sheadel vs Maria Uy / Stacy Stephen6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesANDREA ZUNDEL vs Jill Stephens6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMartha Kelly / Heather Bartlett vs Janey Evans / Karen Berky6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesShannon Krug / Cheryl Inn vs Susan Massey / Cate McDonald7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-17vs TTC-TTC+Split 22
W#1 DoublesGabriela Tango / Joanne Beckett vs Victoria Wolff / Katie McGowan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesANDREA ZUNDEL vs Laura Lundeen1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNora Knox / Victoria Sheadel vs Dana Richardson / Donna Jepsen Minyard6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Inn / Dana Yearsley vs Emily Williams / Elizabeth Street6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-17vs ESTC-MohlerWon 31
W#1 DoublesVictoria Sheadel / Nora Knox vs Theresa Park / Julie Mohler6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJanel Hahn vs Jody Rolnick3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Bartlett / Martha Kelly vs Brenda Nulty / Tami Calkin6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGabriela Tango / Shannon Krug vs Bobbi Kearney / Aubree Nash6-3, 6-4
2024-02-16vs TTC-TTC+Split 22
W#1 DoublesMartha Kelly / Heather Bartlett vs Kerry Moyer / Abby Swancutt7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesANDREA ZUNDEL vs Victoria Wolff6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDana Yearsley / Cheryl Inn vs Katie McGowan / Jane Brass Barth1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Krug / Joanne Beckett vs Ranee McDougal / Sherresa Brasfield6-7, 3-6
2024-02-16vs ACB-MasseyWon 31
W#1 DoublesNora Knox / Victoria Sheadel vs Karen Berky / Christina Godat6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDana Yearsley vs Dawn Degrasse6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Bartlett / Martha Kelly vs Susan Massey / Maria Uy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesANDREA ZUNDEL / Shannon Krug vs Stacy Stephen / Jill Stephens4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Dana Yearsley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Nora Knox
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
ANDREA ZUNDEL
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Cheryl Inn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Joanne Beckett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gabriela Tango
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Heather Bartlett
published
Janel Hahn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Martha Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Shannon Krug
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Sheadel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nora Knox + Victoria Sheadel5074% games+15.3% vs expected
Dana Yearsley + Joanne Beckett12361% games+12.6% vs expected
Joanne Beckett + Shannon Krug3450% games−2.3% vs expected
Nora Knox + Joanne Beckett6552% games−13.3% vs expected
Cheryl Inn + Dana Yearsley224 matchesnot enough data
Dana Yearsley + Nora Knox303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Yearsley
40W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Nora Knox
56W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
4
ANDREA ZUNDEL
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Cheryl Inn
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joanne Beckett
47W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Gabriela Tango
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Heather Bartlett
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janel Hahn
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Kelly
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shannon Krug
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Sheadel
7W–0L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.