Teams

ACB-Massey

2024 ADULT 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-18vs S OR-RVCC-KellySplit 22
L#1 DoublesMaria Uy / Stacy Stephen vs Nora Knox / Victoria Sheadel3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJill Stephens vs ANDREA ZUNDEL7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJaney Evans / Karen Berky vs Martha Kelly / Heather Bartlett1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Massey / Cate McDonald vs Shannon Krug / Cheryl Inn5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-18vs TTC-TTC+Lost 13
L#1 DoublesStacy Stephen / Jill Stephens vs Laura Lundeen / Katie McGowan3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDawn Degrasse vs Victoria Wolff6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Berky / Sherry Rogers vs Khuelien Dretke / Dana Richardson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMargaret Collier / Christina Godat vs Donna Jepsen Minyard / Sherresa Brasfield3-6, 6-7
2024-02-17vs TTC-TTC+Split 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Berky / Janey Evans vs Katie McGowan / Ranee McDougal4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJill Stephens vs Laura Lundeen6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCate McDonald / Stacy Stephen vs Dana Richardson / Khuelien Dretke7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMaria Uy / Sherry Rogers vs Jane Brass Barth / Donna Jepsen Minyard6-1, 6-3
2024-02-17vs ESTC-MohlerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Massey / Sherry Rogers vs Chris Bennion / Sarah Wiggins4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDawn Degrasse vs Darci Christian7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCate McDonald / Maria Uy vs Julie Mohler / Theresa Park6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Godat / Margaret Collier vs Nami Brown / Jody Rolnick2-6, 3-6
2024-02-16vs ESTC-MohlerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCate McDonald / Sherry Rogers vs Kristina Parker / Sarah Wiggins2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Massey vs Nami Brown6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Berky / Janey Evans vs Jody Rolnick / Darci Christian6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Godat / Margaret Collier vs Brenda Nulty / Jennifer Ewert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-16vs S OR-RVCC-KellyLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Berky / Christina Godat vs Nora Knox / Victoria Sheadel0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDawn Degrasse vs Dana Yearsley4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Massey / Maria Uy vs Heather Bartlett / Martha Kelly6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Stephen / Jill Stephens vs ANDREA ZUNDEL / Shannon Krug6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Maria Uy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.90
Karen Berky
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Jill Stephens
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Susan Massey
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.66
Cate McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Christina Godat
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Sherry Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Dawn Degrasse
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.52
Stacy Stephen
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.41
Margaret Collier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janey Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Rogers + Susan Massey2550% games+5.2% vs expected
Karen Berky + Sherry Rogers7064% games+4.3% vs expected
Maria Uy + Susan Massey8653% games+1.1% vs expected
Karen Berky + Janey Evans10358% games+0.7% vs expected
Karen Berky + Christina Godat6550% games−1.5% vs expected
Dawn Degrasse + Stacy Stephen152044% games−4.5% vs expected
Margaret Collier + Christina Godat0537% games−12.7% vs expected
Christina Godat + Sherry Rogers2642% games−17.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Uy
57W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Karen Berky
56W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Jill Stephens
43W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Massey
45W–32L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Cate McDonald
37W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Christina Godat
45W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Sherry Rogers
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Dawn Degrasse
88W–115L career · 3 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Stacy Stephen
70W–78L career · 7 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Margaret Collier
28W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Janey Evans
43W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.