Teams

Herbert 3.5 Fall Day

2025 USTA League Adult 55 & Over - Fall 2024 Day League - HS · 3.5 Women 55D3D

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-12vs Purcell Fall 3.5 DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynne Woodson / Laura Reasner vs Marsha Purcell / Elizabeth Vickery6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVivian Pannell / Tracy McMahan vs Donna Jernigan Vehrs / Linda Thomas4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Doty / Lynne Reynolds vs Carol Irle / Mary Wright6-1, 6-2
2024-11-05vs Jeffery 55+ DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Orr / Barbara Doty vs Kim Anderson / Carolyn Holt3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Mannor / Linda Marie Agee vs Pam Deerman / Peggy Newberry1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTracy McMahan / Julie Ashcraft vs Kathleen Waite / Athena Little4-6, 2-6
2024-10-29vs Purcell Fall 3.5 DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Doty / Shannon Orr vs Audrey Starks / Elizabeth Vickery1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLynne Reynolds / Shannon Lindig vs Linda Thomas / Mary Wright6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulie Ashcraft / Lynne Woodson vs Marsha Purcell / Carol Irle3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-23vs Jeffery 55+ DayLost 02
L#1 DoublesVivian Pannell / Beth Berry vs Judy Wiles / Linda Brewster4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim McCandless / Linda Marie Agee vs Irene Wisner / Peggy Newberry1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-15vs Purcell Fall 3.5 DayLost 12
W#1 DoublesShannon Orr / Shannon Lindig vs Lynda Wallace / Susan Canada6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Mannor / Linda Marie Agee vs Elizabeth Vickery / Donna Jernigan Vehrs5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLynne Woodson / Julie Ashcraft vs Carol Irle / Mary Wright2-6, 5-7
2024-10-11vs Jeffery 55+ DayLost 12
W#1 DoublesShannon Orr / Christine Mannor vs Judy Wiles / Linda Brewster4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Marie Agee / Laura Reasner vs Chris Jackson / Peggy Newberry1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Berry / Kim McCandless vs Kim Anderson / Carolyn Holt0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 55D3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Lynne Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Shannon Orr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Shannon Lindig
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.05
Kim McCandless
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Christine Mannor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Farrow Herbert
published
2.89
Barbara Doty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Laura Reasner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Julie Ashcraft
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Vivian Pannell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Tracy McMahan
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.67
Lynne Woodson
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Linda Marie Agee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Lindig + Julie Ashcraft4169% games+21.7% vs expected
Shannon Lindig + Farrow Herbert4354% games+12.3% vs expected
Shannon Orr + Lynne Reynolds4356% games+11.6% vs expected
Christine Mannor + Farrow Herbert5261% games+10.2% vs expected
Shannon Lindig + Barbara Doty8362% games+8.9% vs expected
Shannon Orr + Christine Mannor6352% games+8.7% vs expected
Vivian Pannell + Kim McCandless2445% games+7.5% vs expected
Shannon Lindig + Christine Mannor1439% games+6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Reynolds
33W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Shannon Orr
51W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Shannon Lindig
95W–95L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
Kim McCandless
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Christine Mannor
55W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Farrow Herbert
28W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Barbara Doty
61W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Laura Reasner
8W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
Julie Ashcraft
24W–29L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Vivian Pannell
8W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Tracy McMahan
34W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Lynne Woodson
18W–36L career · 8 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Linda Marie Agee
3W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.