Teams

Purcell Fall 3.5 Day

2025 USTA League Adult 55 & Over - Fall 2024 Day League - HS · 3.5 Women 55D3D

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-12vs Herbert 3.5 Fall DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarsha Purcell / Elizabeth Vickery vs Lynne Woodson / Laura Reasner4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Jernigan Vehrs / Linda Thomas vs Vivian Pannell / Tracy McMahan6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarol Irle / Mary Wright vs Barbara Doty / Lynne Reynolds1-6, 2-6
2024-11-05vs Powell fall 2025Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAudrey Starks / Elizabeth Vickery vs Charlotte Campbell / Jennifer Daniels6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonna Jernigan Vehrs / Linda Thomas vs Connie Powell / Debra Weaver3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Canada / Mary Wright vs Melissa Jose / Elizabeth Kenney1-6, 2-6
2024-10-31vs Jeffery 55+ DaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarsha Purcell / Audrey Starks vs Peggy Newberry / Chris Jackson6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarol Irle / Linda Thomas vs Judy Wiles / Kathleen Waite2-6, 5-7
2024-10-29vs Herbert 3.5 Fall DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesAudrey Starks / Elizabeth Vickery vs Barbara Doty / Shannon Orr6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Thomas / Mary Wright vs Lynne Reynolds / Shannon Lindig1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarsha Purcell / Carol Irle vs Julie Ashcraft / Lynne Woodson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-23vs Powell fall 2025Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMarsha Purcell / Elizabeth Vickery vs Melinda Anderson / Melissa Jose2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Canada / Lynda Wallace vs Regina Light / Ginger Moore1-6, 3-6
2024-10-21vs Jeffery 55+ DayLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarsha Purcell / Elizabeth Vickery vs Kim Anderson / Athena Little6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Wright / Donna Jernigan Vehrs vs Kathleen Waite / Judy Wiles4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Canada / Lynda Wallace vs Irene Wisner / Peggy Newberry3-6, 1-6
2024-10-15vs Herbert 3.5 Fall DayWon 21
L#1 DoublesLynda Wallace / Susan Canada vs Shannon Orr / Shannon Lindig1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Vickery / Donna Jernigan Vehrs vs Christine Mannor / Linda Marie Agee7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Irle / Mary Wright vs Lynne Woodson / Julie Ashcraft6-2, 7-5
2024-10-11vs Powell fall 2025Lost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Vickery / Audrey Starks vs Ginger Moore / Carole Evans6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarsha Purcell / Linda Thomas vs Cathy Johnson / Elizabeth Weiland6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Canada / Juanita Stewart vs Donna McDaniel / Elizabeth Kenney3-6, 4-6
2024-10-08vs Jeffery 55+ DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarsha Purcell / Linda Thomas vs Linda Brewster / Kim Anderson7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Canada / Donna Jernigan Vehrs vs Patricia Jeffery / Chris Jackson6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 55D3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Audrey Starks
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Donna Jernigan Vehrs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Elizabeth Vickery
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.10
Linda Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.02
Ellen Bean
published
2.96
Lynda Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Marsha Purcell
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.91
Carol Irle
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Susan Canada
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.86
Jean Wells
published
Juanita Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Canada + Donna Jernigan Vehrs6261% games+16.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Vickery + Audrey Starks6064% games+12.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Vickery + Marsha Purcell3350% games+2.2% vs expected
Susan Canada + Lynda Wallace2833% games−9.0% vs expected
Linda Thomas + Donna Jernigan Vehrs123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Jernigan Vehrs + Marsha Purcell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audrey Starks
24W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Donna Jernigan Vehrs
35W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Elizabeth Vickery
53W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Linda Thomas
7W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Ellen Bean
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Lynda Wallace
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
Marsha Purcell
13W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Carol Irle
37W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Susan Canada
18W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
Jean Wells
11W–27L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Juanita Stewart
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.