Teams

BHatfield (Palisades)

2024 Singles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Tues PM

5 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-06vs DGlontz (CSRC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Robert Salvucci6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesTerry Saeger vs David Glontz0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-30vs RGum/Hofmann (Life Time)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Chris Trunck3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTerry Saeger vs Roger Gum2-6, 0-6
2024-07-09vs TTraub (Weddington)Won 20
W#2 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Martin Iles6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTerry Saeger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-02vs DPatel (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDonald Klaproth vs Ramesh Thyagarajan2-6, 4-6
2024-06-25vs RGum/Hofmann (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDonald Klaproth vs Bob Hofmann3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTerry Saeger vs Jim Malseed1-6, 0-6
2024-06-18vs DGlontz (CSRC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDonald Klaproth vs David Glontz6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Sean Fox5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs Scott Schrimsher6-1, 6-1
2024-06-12vs TTraub (Weddington)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDonald Klaproth vs Tom Traub4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Daniel Marthinsen2-6, 6-7
2024-05-28vs DPatel (Blakeney)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDonald Klaproth vs Hakan Pehrsson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs Devesh Patel2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Ricky Marks6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Don Nelson
published
3.70
Donald Klaproth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.51
Keith Gonzales
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.50
Brian Hatfield
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.00
Terry Saeger
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Gonzales + Brian Hatfield31138% games−4.8% vs expected
Brian Hatfield + Terry Saeger1441% gamesnot enough data
Donald Klaproth + Don Nelson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Don Nelson
45W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Donald Klaproth
39W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Keith Gonzales
42W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Brian Hatfield
65W–72L career · 6 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Terry Saeger
77W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.