Teams

SDNC 5.0 Miramar (SAT)- Barnes (Sun)/ Ryan

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD

10 players · average NTRP 4.83 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-14vs SDNC LLW 5.0 San Dieguito TC/ GarciaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyan Hahn / Matthew Roberts vs Jordan Sadowsky / Ryan McBride6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJack Zander / Kailash Venkatraman vs Francois Castejon / Jason Pongsrikul4-6, 3-6
2025-06-07vs SD LLW 5.0 Barnes TC/ HoughLost 01
L#2 DoublesRyan Hahn / Sebastian Salomon vs KASHYAP ASHOK / Patrick Lipscomb3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-01vs WC SD 5.0 Peninsula TC/ Tobi OjoLost 01
L#1 SinglesSebastian Salomon vs William Chiu2-6, 3-6
2025-05-18vs SDNC LLW 5.0 San Dieguito TC/ GarciaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJack Zander / JR Balleweg vs Jordan Sadowsky / Adam Levie1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKailash Venkatraman / Abhishek Nisha Anish vs Jeffrey Fitch / Andrew Wakefield6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-03vs WC SD 5.0 Peninsula TC/ Tobi OjoLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacob Quijano / Matthew Roberts vs Andras Bori / Lucio Cangiano5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJack Zander vs Steven Chen0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKailash Venkatraman / Daniel Goldin vs William Chiu / Oluwatobi Ojo3-6, 2-6
2025-04-26vs SD LLW 5.0 Barnes TC/ HoughLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Hahn / Sebastian Salomon vs Evan Dankiewicz / Gregory de Andrade6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesR Kyle Thompson / Matthew Roberts vs Peter Trhac / Juan Garcia3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRyan Hahn vs Rafael Martinez6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Goldin / Kailash Venkatraman vs Jordan Sadowsky / Christopher Arns6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.62 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Daniel Goldin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.71
Abhishek Nisha Anish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.60
JR Balleweg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.44
Sebastian Salomon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Jack Zander
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Jacob Quijano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kailash Venkatraman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nik Speshilov
published
R Kyle Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Hahn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Daniel Goldin
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.72
5
Abhishek Nisha Anish
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.71
JR Balleweg
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
4.60
4.5
Sebastian Salomon
52W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
4.44
Jack Zander
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacob Quijano
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kailash Venkatraman
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nik Speshilov
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
R Kyle Thompson
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Hahn
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.