Teams

Pitzen

2022 IA 55 & Over Adult League · 8.0 M 55 Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-24vs Blume & Buck - GenesisWon 30
W#1 DoublesRonald Bradfield / Richard Heil vs Jeff Smith / John Micka6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTom Franklin / Douglas Smith vs Stuart Cochrane / Rick Ewald6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPhilip Pitzen / Joel Sissel vs Daniel Pitz / John Doerr7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-03vs ChildersWon 21
L#1 DoublesRonald Miller / Ron Shortenhaus vs Guenter Kierblewski / Romulus Rosario3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTom Franklin / Joseph McAdams vs Daniel Ellard / Randy Childers6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPhilip Pitzen / Douglas Smith vs Michael Addabbo / Kevin Halligan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-27vs IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesRonald Bradfield / David Hash vs Jim Sichterman / Steve Bohn6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRonald Miller / Tom Franklin vs Arthur Khaw / Brian Rohr6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDennis George / Richard Heil vs Brent Foss / Kevin Williams6-2, 6-1
2022-01-16vs IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Heil / Tom Franklin vs Jim Sichterman / Brent Foss6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRon Shortenhaus / Dennis George vs Kevin Williams / Brian Rohr7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2021-12-12vs RussellWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Hash / Joseph McAdams vs Tim Wilson / Christopher Bryant6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoel Sissel / Philip Pitzen vs Philip Gambon / Bill Barker6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRonald Bradfield / Douglas Smith vs John Stierman / Paul Smith6-2, 6-2
2021-11-05vs Blume & Buck - GenesisLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoseph McAdams / Ron Shortenhaus vs Jeff Smith / Martin Fisher Jr0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRonald Miller / Ronald Bradfield vs Michael Bohnenkamp / Keith Buck4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoel Sissel / Philip Pitzen vs Daniel Pitz / Rick Ewald6-7, 4-6
2021-10-03vs RussellLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoel Sissel / Joseph McAdams vs John Stierman / Paul Smith6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRonald Miller / Douglas Smith vs Christopher Bryant / Tim Wilson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDennis George / Ron Shortenhaus vs Charles Mahoski / James Russell5-7, 3-6
2021-09-19vs ChildersWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Franklin / Ronald Miller vs Fred Pedersen / Thomas Foley6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoel Sissel / Ronald Bradfield vs Guenter Kierblewski / Robert Armbrust6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPhilip Pitzen / Joseph McAdams vs Romulus Rosario / Kevin Halligan2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 M 55 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pitzen53141025194
2Childers53121229237
3IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M44121230236
4Blume & Buck - Genesis35111327215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
David Hash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Richard Heil
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Ronald Bradfield
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Ron Shortenhaus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Dennis George
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joel Sissel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Joseph McAdams
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Philip Pitzen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Ronald Miller
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Tom Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Heil + Ronald Bradfield141152% games−0.4% vs expected
Joseph McAdams + Philip Pitzen1546% gamesnot enough data
Ron Shortenhaus + Philip Pitzen2442% gamesnot enough data
Joel Sissel + Ronald Bradfield4162% gamesnot enough data
Joel Sissel + Philip Pitzen314 matchesnot enough data
Joseph McAdams + Joel Sissel213 matchesnot enough data
Tom Franklin + Richard Heil123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Hash
25W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
4.01
Richard Heil
64W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Ronald Bradfield
55W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Ron Shortenhaus
18W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Dennis George
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joel Sissel
28W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph McAdams
14W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Philip Pitzen
14W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ronald Miller
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Franklin
16W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.