Teams

Blume & Buck - Genesis

2022 IA 55 & Over Adult League · 8.0 M 55 Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-01vs ChildersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeith Buck / John Doerr vs Kevin Halligan / Michael Addabbo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Pitz / Martin Fisher Jr vs Fred Pedersen / Thomas Foley6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStuart Cochrane / James Smith vs Guenter Kierblewski / Randy Childers3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-24vs PitzenLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Smith / John Micka vs Ronald Bradfield / Richard Heil3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStuart Cochrane / Rick Ewald vs Tom Franklin / Douglas Smith2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Pitz / John Doerr vs Philip Pitzen / Joel Sissel6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-13vs RussellLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff Smith / John Micka vs Charles Mahoski / Joe Slavens6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Finn / David Carlyle vs Bill Barker / Christopher Bryant1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Bohnenkamp / Keith Buck vs William Hughes / John Stierman1-6, 4-6
2022-01-30vs IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0MWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Olsgaard / James Smith vs Jim Sichterman / Brent Foss2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Smith / John Micka vs Brian Rohr / Kevin Williams7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Pitz / Martin Fisher Jr vs Arthur Khaw / John Hedstrom6-0, 6-4
2022-01-16vs ChildersLost 12
L#1 DoublesTim Pratt / Rick Ewald vs Michael Addabbo / Bradley Hartje3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Bohnenkamp / Martin Fisher Jr vs Romulus Rosario / Kevin Halligan4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKeith Buck / David Olsgaard vs Guenter Kierblewski / Randy Childers3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-11-14vs RussellWon 21
W#1 DoublesMike Conlon / Martin Fisher Jr vs Bill Barker / Charles Mahoski6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Bohnenkamp / Keith Buck vs Tim Wilson / Christopher Bryant4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Pitz / Rick Ewald vs James Russell / Philip Gambon6-4, 6-1
2021-11-05vs PitzenWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeff Smith / Martin Fisher Jr vs Joseph McAdams / Ron Shortenhaus6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Bohnenkamp / Keith Buck vs Ronald Miller / Ronald Bradfield6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Pitz / Rick Ewald vs Joel Sissel / Philip Pitzen7-6, 6-4
2021-10-17vs IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Bohnenkamp / Daniel Pitz vs Jim Sichterman / Arthur Khaw3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKeith Buck / Rick Ewald vs John Hedstrom / Richard Leake7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 M 55 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pitzen53141025194
2Childers53121229237
3IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M44121230236
4Blume & Buck - Genesis35111327215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Matthew Whipps
published
3.73
Martin Fisher Jr
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.72
David Olsgaard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Rick Ewald
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.60
Michael Bohnenkamp
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.53
John Micka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
David Carlyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniel Pitz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
John Doerr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Keith Buck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Blume
published
Mike Conlon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stuart Cochrane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tim Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Whipps + David Olsgaard4153% games+12.1% vs expected
Daniel Pitz + Martin Fisher Jr5354% gamesnot enough data
David Olsgaard + Keith Buck5159% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bohnenkamp + Keith Buck1444% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Whipps + Martin Fisher Jr134 matchesnot enough data
David Carlyle + Stuart Cochrane303 matchesnot enough data
Michael Bohnenkamp + David Olsgaard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Whipps
63W–57L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Martin Fisher Jr
53W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
David Olsgaard
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Rick Ewald
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Michael Bohnenkamp
20W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
John Micka
61W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
David Carlyle
7W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Daniel Pitz
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Doerr
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Keith Buck
25W–20L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Blume
19W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Conlon
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Stuart Cochrane
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Pratt
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.