Teams

WNCD Loftin (BFCC)

Adult 40 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 40+ Adult Women 4.0 Thurs

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-14vs WNCV Massey (Aston Park)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolina Hart / Bonnie Vandegrift vs Anna Bacher Brown / ASHLEY MORAN2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Freeman / Terry Davis vs Mitra Sadeghian / Sallie LaChance0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Loftin / Angela Newnam vs Amanda Nichols / Janey Cope7-5, 6-4
2026-05-14vs WNCT Reeks (Aston Park)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBonnie Vandegrift / Carolina Hart vs Susanna Saidi / Susan Walker6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Black / Terry Davis vs Lee Carson / Alexandra Moody2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Gillespie / Mary Freeman vs Elizabeth Nikolov / Kimberly Kneier4-6, 4-6
2026-05-07vs WNCS Manley (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Wood / Nicole Ingle vs Beate Madden / Rachel Horn3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Loftin / Angela Newnam vs Amanda Williams / Jennifer Hull4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarolina Hart / Mary Freeman vs Susie Manley / Jennie West3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-04-30vs WNCM Wendel (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Loftin / Angela Newnam vs Karen Babcock / Cynthia Beane3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Wood / Nicole Ingle vs Mary Ann Wendel / Kelly McEnany6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarolina Hart / Mary Freeman vs Sherrie Voyles / Kelly Hetherington0-6, 0-6
2026-04-23vs WNCJ Hudgens (HRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Wood / Nicole Ingle vs Jessica Pierce / TLynn Gilpin4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBonnie Vandegrift / Betsy Gillespie vs Jennifer Hudgens / Sharlyn Aamodt4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Loftin / Angela Newnam vs Amelia Duernberger / Angela Hare6-1, 6-1
2026-04-18vs WNCV Massey (Aston Park)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNicole Ingle / Lauren Wood vs ASHLEY MORAN / Janey Cope7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Freeman / Elizabeth Summerlin vs Vickie Massey / Amanda Nichols3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Loftin / Angela Newnam vs Susan Sparboe-Derry / Angelika Drew4-6, 3-6
2026-04-16vs WNCS Manley (ARC South)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Wood / Nicole Ingle vs Susie Manley / Jean Lawler7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDonna Loftin / Angela Newnam vs Martha Habegger / Hilary Thomas3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Black / Terry Davis vs Stacey Schulhofer / Catherine Jones1-6, 3-6
2026-04-09vs WNCT Reeks (Aston Park)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Newnam / Donna Loftin vs Beth Meacham / Theresa Hash3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLauren Wood / Nicole Ingle vs Janet Sweezey / Vivian Gibson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Freeman / Terry Davis vs Dawn Johnson / Nancy Pryately6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-02vs WNCJ Hudgens (HRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Wood / Nicole Ingle vs Denise Jackson / Angela Hare6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Loftin / Angela Newnam vs Kenna Armstrong / Heidi Zehr3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBonnie Vandegrift / Susan Black vs Beth MacDonald / TLynn Gilpin5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Adult Women 4.0 Thurs have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Lauren Wood
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.70
Carolina Hart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Bonnie Vandegrift
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Angela Newnam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.59
Donna Loftin
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.44
Betsy Gillespie
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Nicole Ingle
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Elizabeth Summerlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Mary Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.98
Terry Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Loftin + Angela Newnam11952% games+0.8% vs expected
Nicole Ingle + Lauren Wood5749% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Wood
10W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Carolina Hart
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Bonnie Vandegrift
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Angela Newnam
22W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Donna Loftin
17W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Betsy Gillespie
16W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Nicole Ingle
18W–20L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elizabeth Summerlin
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mary Freeman
7W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Terry Davis
6W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.