Teams

WNCJ Hudgens (HRC)

Adult 40 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 40+ Adult Women 4.0 Thurs

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-28vs WNCT Reeks (Aston Park)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Pierce / Katie Bradley vs Beth Meacham / Theresa Hash6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hudgens / TLynn Gilpin vs Susanna Saidi / Alexandra Moody7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmelia Duernberger / Yvonne Monet vs Nancy Pryately / Kimberly Kneier7-5, 6-1
2026-05-18vs WNCS Manley (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Pierce / Yvonne Monet vs Martha Habegger / Hilary Thomas0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Zehr / Beth MacDonald vs Jean Lawler / Jennie West3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Jackson / Amelia Duernberger vs Anne Salter / Jennifer Hull2-6, 3-6
2026-05-15vs WNCM Wendel (ARC South)Split 11
L#1 DoublesHeidi Zehr / Yvonne Monet vs Sarah Corley / Sherrie Voyles1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hudgens / Katie Bradley vs Kelly Hetherington / Rebecca Carchman6-2, 6-4
2026-05-07vs WNCT Reeks (Aston Park)Split 11
L#2 DoublesHeidi Zehr / Jennifer Hudgens vs Lisa Baugh / Janet Sweezey7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Hare / Sharlyn Aamodt vs Tricia Reeks / Dawn Johnson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-30vs WNCS Manley (ARC South)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesYvonne Monet / Beth MacDonald vs Susie Manley / Jennie West5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Jackson / Amelia Duernberger vs Jean Lawler / Martha Habegger3-6, 3-6
2026-04-23vs WNCD Loftin (BFCC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hudgens / Sharlyn Aamodt vs Bonnie Vandegrift / Betsy Gillespie6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmelia Duernberger / Angela Hare vs Donna Loftin / Angela Newnam1-6, 1-6
2026-04-16vs WNCV Massey (Aston Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hudgens / Beth MacDonald vs Kathryn Button / Vickie Massey7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Bradley / Heidi Zehr vs Anna Bacher Brown / Quenton Wright4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmelia Duernberger / Denise Jackson vs Janey Cope / ASHLEY MORAN3-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs WNCV Massey (Aston Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHeidi Zehr / Beth MacDonald vs Susan Sparboe-Derry / ASHLEY MORAN0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Monet / TLynn Gilpin vs Mitra Sadeghian / Kelly Gillis3-6, 2-6
2026-04-09vs WNCM Wendel (ARC South)Won 21
W#1 DoublesYvonne Monet / Sharlyn Aamodt vs Kelly McEnany / Sarah Corley2-3
W#2 DoublesBeth MacDonald / Heidi Zehr vs Susan Cook / Rebecca Carchman6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica Pierce / Katie Bradley vs Lynne Weinrib / Mary B Wilder6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-02vs WNCD Loftin (BFCC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Jackson / Angela Hare vs Lauren Wood / Nicole Ingle3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKenna Armstrong / Heidi Zehr vs Donna Loftin / Angela Newnam6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeth MacDonald / TLynn Gilpin vs Bonnie Vandegrift / Susan Black7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Adult Women 4.0 Thurs have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Katie Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Beth MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Yvonne Monet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Jennifer Hudgens
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Amelia Duernberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Heidi Zehr
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.42
Sharlyn Aamodt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
TLynn Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.31
Angela Hare
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Kenna Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Hudgens + TLynn Gilpin2456% games+10.8% vs expected
Heidi Zehr + Beth MacDonald2341% gamesnot enough data
Kenna Armstrong + Heidi Zehr224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hudgens + Beth MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
TLynn Gilpin + Beth MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Bradley
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Beth MacDonald
6W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Yvonne Monet
13W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Jennifer Hudgens
23W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Amelia Duernberger
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Heidi Zehr
10W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
Sharlyn Aamodt
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
TLynn Gilpin
286W–221L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Angela Hare
9W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Kenna Armstrong
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.