Teams

SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18MX8.0A

2022 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-02-05vs BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 18MX8.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Green / Chamane Ifland vs Donna Murphy / Alfredo Vigil1-6, 0-6
2022-01-15vs BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 18MX8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesConnor Ard / Chamane Ifland vs Sabrina Grafton / Brian R Wills6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Connor Ard
published 4.5
4.24
Andreya Arevalo
published 4.5
4.15
Angelita Vallejo
published 4.5
3.99
Jennifer Vice
published
3.96
Ava Ascher
published 4
3.87
Marcelo Nunes
published
3.71
Robert Duong
published
3.70
Lynn Ventura
published
3.69
Laura Manelia
published
3.67
Jason Carlay
published
3.66
Edmundo Manelia
published 4
3.62
Rommel Bautista
published
3.59
JoAnn Clark
published
3.53
Darci Nunes
published 4
3.48
Seleste Buriani
published
3.44
Chamane Ifland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.11
Alexander Ard
published 3.5
Lance Buriani
published
Robert Green
published
Valerie Blanchard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcelo Nunes + Darci Nunes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor Ard
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Andreya Arevalo
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Angelita Vallejo
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Jennifer Vice
15W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Ava Ascher
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Marcelo Nunes
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.87
Robert Duong
31W–41L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Lynn Ventura
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Laura Manelia
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jason Carlay
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Edmundo Manelia
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Rommel Bautista
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
JoAnn Clark
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Darci Nunes
9W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Seleste Buriani
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
4
Chamane Ifland
107W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Alexander Ard
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lance Buriani
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Green
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Blanchard
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.