Teams

Team 1 McCann

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.67 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-15vs Team 1 NOVA CrushWon 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Pham / Blair Reid vs Whitney Slahetka / Arial Pegues6-4, 6-1
2024-09-08vs Team 3 Honey DeucesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAngel Amponsah / Blair Reid vs Theresa Connolly / Kristen Schopp6-2, 6-0
2024-09-04vs Team 4 Jackson- Belle HavenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mitchell / Blair Reid vs Lisa Karlisch / Jill Mote6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Lorena Valente
published
4.78
Cecile Hult
published 5
4.65
Inese Williamson
published
4.43
Heather Carr
published
4.28
Erin Green
published
4.15
Mary Ann Wagner
published
4.14
Elizabeth McCann
published
4.06
Brita Robinson
published 4.5
4.05
Blair Reid
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
Lucy Wang
published
Laura Smith
published
Tara Jakubik
published
Verna Flemming
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth McCann + Heather Carr5071% games+7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorena Valente
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.83
5
Cecile Hult
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.78
Inese Williamson
27W–15L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.65
Heather Carr
40W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
4.43
Erin Green
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
Mary Ann Wagner
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
4.15
Elizabeth McCann
35W–10L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Brita Robinson
45W–35L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
4.5
Blair Reid
157W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
Lucy Wang
34W–15L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.85
Elizabeth Vermillion
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Smith
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tara Jakubik
36W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Verna Flemming
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.