Teams

Team 4 Jackson- Belle Haven

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-09-25vs Team 1 NOVA CrushLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeighAnn Jackson / Lisa Karlisch vs Cecelia Campbell / Alexandra Castleberry4-6, 3-5
2024-09-24vs Team 5 Dream TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Elsheikh / Lisa Karlisch vs Beth Kiesner / Lisa Puzzuoli6-3, 6-3
2024-09-08vs Team 5 TrifectaLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeighAnn Jackson / Melanie Pyle vs Melissa Hampton / Bobbi Shoop4-6, 5-7
2024-09-04vs Team 1 McCannLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Karlisch / Jill Mote vs Jennifer Mitchell / Blair Reid0-6, 1-6
2024-09-03vs Team 9 Net DancersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberley Griffith / Lisa Karlisch vs Shan Wang / Tana Jankowiak7-5, 5-5
2024-08-18vs Team 4 Springfield Summer AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Karlisch / Kimberley Griffith vs Michelle Lease / Caitlin Clark2-6, 0-6
2024-08-15vs Team 5 TrifectaLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberley Griffith / Lisa Karlisch vs Dana Moss / Bobbi Shoop6-7, 2-3
2024-08-13vs Team 2 Tri & Catch UsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Karlisch / Stephanie Elsheikh vs Jeanne Baily / Carolyn Greis7-6, 2-4
2024-08-11vs Team 1 NOVA CrushLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Risell / LeighAnn Jackson vs Cara Holtmann / Maureen Fox4-6, 4-5
2024-08-07vs Team 2 Triple Shots 4.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesCheryl Risell / Lisa Karlisch vs Lesley Wellener / Andrea Gevas6-7, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheryl Risell
published 4
3.68
LeighAnn Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Lisa Karlisch
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LeighAnn Jackson + Lisa Karlisch2640% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Risell
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
LeighAnn Jackson
51W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Lisa Karlisch
40W–60L career · 8 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.