Teams

NWO 18&Over 4.0W Szczechowski/Hoffman-U of Findlay

2022 NWO Adult 18 & Over Night · NWO Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-28vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Irwin-PTCLost 04
L#1 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Karen Hoban vs Emma Carter / Brenda Irwin2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Hesterman vs Caitlyn Schankula3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarianne McNerney / Julie Szczechowski vs Lisa Evans / Ann Miller3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCayla Swisher vs Amanda Smith2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesRies Hohman / Melinda Murphy vs Jill Gauthier / Tina Nordyke6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSusan Dessner vs Amber Copa2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGail Harris / Anne Parker vs Jessica Vietmeier / Theresa Vietmeier0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarianne McNerney / Julie Szczechowski vs Dana Loeb / Erin Sturgeon7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-14vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Pilewski-SVCWon 41
W#1 DoublesCorinne Hoffman / Melinda Murphy vs Christina Konz / Rebecca Chen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHannah Hesterman vs Julie Britton6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJane Heck / Susan Dessner vs Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar / Tala Safadi6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCayla Swisher vs Mary Ann Holmes6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacy Jurich / Julie Szczechowski vs Hope Modlin / Sara Shelton6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesSusan Dessner / Jane Heck vs Denise Nisbett / Elizabeth Wymer7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHannah Hesterman vs Nancy Rumpf3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Cayla Swisher vs Emily Nixon / Andrea Wymer5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Szczechowski / Corinne Hoffman vs Carrie Zanville / Jen Sanderson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-23vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kiel-PTCWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan Dessner / Jane Heck vs Christina Tam / Denise Mcgee-Grimme2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Miller / Marianne McNerney vs Keri Buff / Rosanna Wong7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCayla Swisher vs Lucinda Busselle5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Szczechowski / Stacy Jurich vs Kelly Kessler / Julie Ryder6-2, 7-5
2022-06-16vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Irwin-PTCLost 13
L#1 DoublesGail Harris / Anne Parker vs Hilary Hayden / Amy Young2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Little / Ries Hohman vs Brenda Irwin / Amanda Paule4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHannah Hesterman vs Amanda Smith3-6, 5-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Heck / Julie Szczechowski vs Kelly Carter / Kathleen Hire3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesCorinne Hoffman / Maria Little vs Didi Thomason / Melissa Hill3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesHannah Hesterman vs Amber Copa7-6, 4-3
L#2 DoublesMarianne McNerney / Nancy Miller vs Jessica Vietmeier / Theresa Vietmeier3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCayla Swisher vs Nancy Malcuit6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Szczechowski / Stacy Jurich vs Jill Gauthier / Tina Nordyke6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-02vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Pilewski-SVCLost 23
L#1 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Susan Dessner vs Christina Konz / Jennifer Kasee4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Hesterman vs Julie Britton1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Miller / Marianne McNerney vs Adrienne Pilewski / Rebecca Chen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCayla Swisher vs Mary Ann Holmes3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Szczechowski / Corinne Hoffman vs Hope Modlin / Sara Shelton6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Jane Heck vs Emily Nixon / Denise Nisbett0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCayla Swisher vs Samantha LaPointe0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Parker / Gail Harris vs Sarah Ward / Renee Allen1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesHannah Hesterman vs Sarah Norr7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Dessner / Marianne McNerney vs Lisa Reichert / Jennifer Morgan1-6, 3-6
2022-05-19vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kiel-PTCWon 32
L#1 DoublesKaren Hoban / Melinda Murphy vs Amy Farrar / Lyndsey Lucas6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCayla Swisher vs Hallie Williams4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Dessner / Jane Heck vs Stacey Kiel / Keri Buff6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHannah Hesterman vs Brenda Scott6-7, 4-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCorinne Hoffman / Julie Szczechowski vs Christine Gohr / Nancy Cheatwood6-2, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NWO Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 18&Over 4.0W LaPointe/Nixon-TTC91361438378
2NWO 18&Over 4.0W Irwin-PTC73331744427
3NWO 18&Over 4.0W Flickinger/ Campbell-TWOS73282250426
4NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kiel-PTC37183269487
5NWO 18&Over 4.0W Szczechowski/Hoffman-U of Findlay37203070491
6NWO 18&Over 4.0W Pilewski-SVC19153576512

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Hannah Hesterman
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4
3.53
Cayla Swisher
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Maria Little
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Julie Szczechowski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
2.95
Gail Harris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jane Heck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Hoban
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marianne McNerney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melinda Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Stacy Jurich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Dessner
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Heck + Susan Dessner5252% games+1.3% vs expected
Julie Szczechowski + Cayla Swisher61045% games+1.0% vs expected
Julie Szczechowski + Susan Dessner3944% games−0.7% vs expected
Jane Heck + Melinda Murphy5159% games−1.1% vs expected
Julie Szczechowski + Stacy Jurich141448% games−5.3% vs expected
Hannah Hesterman + Cayla Swisher3253% games−5.6% vs expected
Julie Szczechowski + Marianne McNerney3544% gamesnot enough data
Julie Szczechowski + Melinda Murphy4253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hannah Hesterman
45W–28L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
3.5
Cayla Swisher
82W–56L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
Maria Little
30W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Julie Szczechowski
186W–189L career · 22 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Gail Harris
21W–41L career · 10 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Jane Heck
41W–21L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Hoban
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marianne McNerney
87W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Murphy
31W–22L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Jurich
27W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Dessner
52W–62L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.