Teams

NWO 18&Over 4.0W Pilewski-SVC

2022 NWO Adult 18 & Over Night · NWO Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesJennifer Kasee / Christina Konz vs Samantha LaPointe / Lisa Burke1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Britton vs Carrie Zanville7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnnsley Mann / Mary Ann Holmes vs Jen Sanderson / Andrea Wymer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Bernard / Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar vs Jennifer Morgan / Dawn Cameron3-6, 2-6
2022-07-21vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kiel-PTCLost 14
L#1 DoublesSusan Bernard / Annsley Mann vs Amy Farrar / Denise Mcgee-Grimme1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJulie Britton vs Keyuko Kuyama6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHope Modlin / Tala Safadi vs Nancy Cheatwood / Brenda Scott4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAdrienne Pilewski vs Lucinda Busselle6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Turner / Renee Bezeau vs Julie Ryder / Keri Buff2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesChristina Konz / Rebecca Chen vs Corinne Hoffman / Melinda Murphy2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJulie Britton vs Hannah Hesterman7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChahnaz Almadfae Haidar / Tala Safadi vs Jane Heck / Susan Dessner4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMary Ann Holmes vs Cayla Swisher3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHope Modlin / Sara Shelton vs Stacy Jurich / Julie Szczechowski1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRania Eid / Christina Konz vs Melissa Hill / Didi Thomason6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnnsley Mann vs Jessica Vietmeier6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Chen / Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar vs Dana Loeb / Theresa Vietmeier6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAdrienne Pilewski vs Amber Copa4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Turner / Tala Safadi vs Michele Flickinger / Jill Gauthier3-6, 2-6
2022-06-23vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Irwin-PTCLost 23
W#1 DoublesAnnsley Mann / Jennifer Kasee vs Amy Young / Brenda Irwin7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJulie Britton vs Caitlyn Schankula6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRania Eid / Susan Bernard vs Hilary Hayden / Renisa Dorner2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesChristina Konz vs Lisa Evans6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTala Safadi / Renee Bezeau vs Natalie Pendell / Susan Spragg4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesChristina Konz / Jennifer Kasee vs Emily Nixon / Jen Sanderson4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Britton vs Nancy Rumpf1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Pilewski / Annsley Mann vs Lisa Burke / Julie MacMillan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHope Modlin / Kimberly Turner vs Jennifer Morgan / Sara Johnson0-6, 1-6
2022-06-09vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kiel-PTCLost 23
L#1 DoublesRania Eid / Mary Ann Holmes vs Christina Tam / Christine Gohr1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kasee vs Lyndsey Lucas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Pilewski / Annsley Mann vs Rosanna Wong / Keri Buff2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChahnaz Almadfae Haidar vs Lucinda Busselle5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSara Shelton / Renee Bezeau vs Brenda Scott / Julie Ryder0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesChristina Konz / Jennifer Kasee vs Melinda Murphy / Susan Dessner6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJulie Britton vs Hannah Hesterman6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Pilewski / Rebecca Chen vs Nancy Miller / Marianne McNerney6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMary Ann Holmes vs Cayla Swisher6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHope Modlin / Sara Shelton vs Julie Szczechowski / Corinne Hoffman1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJulie Britton / Mary Ann Holmes vs Melissa Hill / Theresa Vietmeier2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kasee vs Julieann Campbell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Turner / Rania Eid vs Jill Gauthier / Tina Nordyke0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChahnaz Almadfae Haidar vs Jessica Vietmeier3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHope Modlin / Annsley Mann vs Amber Copa / Vickie Busby6-7, 4-5
2022-05-20vs NWO 18&Over 4.0W Irwin-PTCLost 14
L#1 DoublesRebecca Chen / Jennifer Kasee vs Amy Young / Hilary Hayden1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Britton vs Lisa Evans6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Bernard / Adrienne Pilewski vs Karen Rippey / Susan Spragg5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAnnsley Mann vs Amanda Smith3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Konz / Renee Bezeau vs Brenda Irwin / Ann Miller6-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NWO Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 18&Over 4.0W LaPointe/Nixon-TTC91361438378
2NWO 18&Over 4.0W Irwin-PTC73331744427
3NWO 18&Over 4.0W Flickinger/ Campbell-TWOS73282250426
4NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kiel-PTC37183269487
5NWO 18&Over 4.0W Szczechowski/Hoffman-U of Findlay37203070491
6NWO 18&Over 4.0W Pilewski-SVC19153576512

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Julie Britton
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 8% · published
Annsley Mann
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.57
Christina Konz
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.53
Mary Ann Holmes
usually #1 Singles 62%, also #1 Doubles 15% · published
3.46
Adrienne Pilewski
usually #2 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.11
Rania Eid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Hope Modlin
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Tala Safadi
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Renee Bezeau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Kasee
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Susan Bernard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tala Safadi + Adrienne Pilewski6159% games+8.1% vs expected
Rania Eid + Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar4442% games−1.6% vs expected
Mary Ann Holmes + Adrienne Pilewski3543% games−3.7% vs expected
Adrienne Pilewski + Hope Modlin2540% games−5.4% vs expected
Tala Safadi + Hope Modlin2932% games−8.4% vs expected
Julie Britton + Mary Ann Holmes4252% gamesnot enough data
Rania Eid + Adrienne Pilewski224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Holmes + Hope Modlin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Britton
130W–72L career · 12 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Annsley Mann
11W–22L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
150W–96L career · 10 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Christina Konz
110W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Mary Ann Holmes
120W–113L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Adrienne Pilewski
226W–231L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Rania Eid
49W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
3
Hope Modlin
96W–184L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
Tala Safadi
73W–117L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Renee Bezeau
18W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.82
Jennifer Kasee
19W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Bernard
34W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.