Teams

BM RED

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-23vs HRCA REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Osborne / Stacey Townsend vs Judy Monahan / Laura Hoganson2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathleen Turner / Carol Markley vs Carol Chiolero / Shannon Porter4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Hobson / Meg Lutes vs Susan Holt / Lynn Hoppe7-6, 6-2
2021-06-16vs CK REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeg Lutes / Patti Blanchard vs Mary Thompson / Ann Hugh2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Lane / Carol Markley vs Judith Barnes / Stephanie Courtney3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Leder / Connie Parris vs Beth Burns / Sandy Reed4-6, 4-6
2021-06-09vs GR GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanet Lane / Carol Markley vs Philippa Biggi / Teri Harrington2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Leder / Connie Parris vs Lisa Herring / Sharon Swihart6-5
L#3 DoublesJane Miley / Meg Lutes vs Leann Koontz / Susan Hickel1-6, 3-6
2021-06-02vs SSLGT YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesConnie Parris / Laurie Leder vs Lynne Monnar / Kathleen Finley2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Lutes / Patti Blanchard vs Fauna MacKillip / Carol Avery2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Turner / Pamela Osborne vs Mairi Wells / Maria Hush6-2, 7-5
2021-05-26vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Turner / Mary Hobson vs Robin Cann / Joyce Naylon2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Townsend / Patti Blanchard vs Marsha Summerlin / Julie Heck3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-05-19vs PH TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Markley / Janet Lane vs Wynne Freeman / Ming Hall3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Leder / Jane Miley vs Colleen Powell / Peggy Block1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Greco / Mary Hobson vs Nhung Van / Kristin McDonald0-6, 2-6
2021-05-12vs LEBTC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Lane / Carol Markley vs Cindy Arnell / VANESSA TURNBULL1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatti Blanchard / Mary Hobson vs LISA HAGEN / Sandy Stocker3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJane Miley / Stacey Townsend vs Vickie Conroy / Carmel Walz4-6, 4-6
2021-05-05vs HRCA REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Greco / Kathleen Turner vs Shannon Porter / Laura Hoganson0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Lane / Jane Miley vs Sally Heaton / Leslie Dowaschinski3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPatti Blanchard / Pamela Osborne vs Judy Monahan / Lynn Hoppe2-6, 1-6
2021-05-01vs CK REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacey Townsend / Jane Miley vs Linda McMahan / Katherine Phillips2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Hobson / Kathleen Turner vs Judith Barnes / Ann Hugh4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Lane / Carol Markley vs Linda Head / Janet McMahon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Carol Markley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Mary Hobson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.40
Patti Blanchard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jane Miley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Janet Lane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Turner
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Laurie Leder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Meg Lutes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Pamela Osborne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stacey Townsend
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Markley + Janet Lane31338% gamesnot enough data
Carol Markley + Mary Hobson4643% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Turner + Mary Hobson2345% gamesnot enough data
Janet Lane + Jane Miley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carol Markley
24W–43L career · 6 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Mary Hobson
34W–65L career · 5 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Patti Blanchard
15W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
2.40
Jane Miley
4W–24L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Janet Lane
9W–25L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Turner
18W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laurie Leder
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Meg Lutes
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamela Osborne
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacey Townsend
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.