Teams

CK RED

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-23vs LEBTC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Burns / Sandy Reed vs LISA HAGEN / Sandy Stocker0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMary Thompson / Stephanie Courtney vs Margie Walsh / Cindy Arnell7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJanet McMahon / Judith Barnes vs Carmel Walz / Kathleen Walters1-6, 0-6
2021-06-16vs BM REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Thompson / Ann Hugh vs Meg Lutes / Patti Blanchard6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJudith Barnes / Stephanie Courtney vs Janet Lane / Carol Markley6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBeth Burns / Sandy Reed vs Laurie Leder / Connie Parris6-4, 6-4
2021-06-09vs SSLGT YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Reed / Linda McMahan vs Lynne Monnar / Kathleen Finley2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Courtney / Beth Burns vs Vicki Sullivan / Maria Hush4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Head / Judith Barnes vs Becky Lowery / Stephanee Schlachtenhaufen7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-02vs PH TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Hugh / Sandy Reed vs Cheri Bradley / Wynne Freeman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda McMahan / Katherine Phillips vs Peggy Block / Colleen Powell4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Barnes / Mary Thompson vs Christy Brant / Nhung Van2-6, 0-6
2021-05-26vs HRCA REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Head / Ann Hugh vs Beth Beers / Sally Heaton6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Burns / Sandy Reed vs Shannon Porter / Susan Holt7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanet McMahon / Mary Thompson vs Carol Chiolero / Lynn Hoppe7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-19vs GR GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Burns / Sandy Reed vs Philippa Biggi / Teri Harrington4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet McMahon / Linda Head vs Vicki Kern / Gail Heitland6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMary Thompson / Ann Hugh vs Leann Koontz / Deborah Roth6-3, 6-3
2021-05-12vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda McMahan / Katherine Phillips vs Robin Cann / Julie Heck1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudith Barnes / Ann Hugh vs Jana Warwick / Patty Carstens2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Reed / Stephanie Courtney vs Janet Burns / Sandi Plude1-6, 0-6
2021-05-05vs LEBTC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda McMahan / Katherine Phillips vs Cindy Arnell / VANESSA TURNBULL1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Hugh / Sandy Reed vs Jeanne Dearth / Margie Walsh1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Barnes / Janet McMahon vs Janie Magyar / Kathleen Walters7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2021-05-01vs BM REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda McMahan / Katherine Phillips vs Stacey Townsend / Jane Miley6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJudith Barnes / Ann Hugh vs Mary Hobson / Kathleen Turner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Head / Janet McMahon vs Janet Lane / Carol Markley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Ann Hugh
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.04
Mary Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Sandy Reed
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Linda Head
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Janet McMahon
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Judith Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Katherine Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Linda McMahan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Stephanie Courtney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Thompson + Ann Hugh152048% games−3.5% vs expected
Judith Barnes + Janet McMahon1437% gamesnot enough data
Linda Head + Sandy Reed2349% gamesnot enough data
Linda McMahan + Katherine Phillips224 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Reed + Ann Hugh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Hugh
61W–77L career · 7 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
Mary Thompson
33W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.04
Sandy Reed
40W–53L career · 8 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Linda Head
33W–56L career · 4 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.56
Janet McMahon
8W–16L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Judith Barnes
4W–22L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katherine Phillips
6W–18L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda McMahan
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Courtney
13W–20L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.