Teams

Wynlakes Stapper

2025 · 2026 Fall USTA 55 & Over Day League - Montgomery

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-03vs Wynlakes Payne/Harvey 55s 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura McLemore / Nora Cammack vs Katie Gerst / Sandra Putz2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErin Bullington / Carol Stapper vs Ethel Holladay / Shelia Walker6-7, 0-6
2025-10-06vs Wynlakes Payne/Harvey 55s 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura McLemore / Cheryl Martin vs Laura Harvey / Jenny Kimel1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Eley / Leah Leal vs Jennifer Davis / Jenni Payne2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNora Cammack / Susan Veres vs Katie Gerst / Sandra Putz0-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs Wynlakes Payne/Harvey 55s 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLeah Leal / Lisa Eley vs Mimi Smith / Jenni Payne3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura McLemore / Debbie Daniel vs Leslie Davis / Laura Harvey1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Stapper / Susan Veres vs Jennifer Davis / Katie Gerst3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Fall USTA 55 & Over Day League - Montgomery have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Erin Bullington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Emily Newell
published 4
3.74
Marla Crow
published
3.64
Laura McLemore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Carol Stapper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Leah Leal
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.45
Debbie Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Nora Cammack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Susan Veres
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Lisa Eley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Kimberly Mathews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura McLemore + Leah Leal5158% games+5.1% vs expected
Lisa Eley + Susan Veres2443% games−2.0% vs expected
Carol Stapper + Susan Veres224 matchesnot enough data
Laura McLemore + Nora Cammack123 matchesnot enough data
Laura McLemore + Marla Crow213 matchesnot enough data
Carol Stapper + Erin Bullington033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Eley + Leah Leal033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin Bullington
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Emily Newell
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Marla Crow
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Laura McLemore
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.64
4
Carol Stapper
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Leah Leal
11W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Debbie Daniel
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.45
Nora Cammack
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.43
Susan Veres
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.41
Lisa Eley
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.40
Kimberly Mathews
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.