Teams

Wynlakes Payne/Harvey 55s 4.0

2025 · 2026 Fall USTA 55 & Over Day League - Montgomery

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-03vs Wynlakes StapperWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Gerst / Sandra Putz vs Laura McLemore / Nora Cammack6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Harvey / Jenny Kimel vs Kimberly Mathews / Cheryl Martin6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEthel Holladay / Shelia Walker vs Erin Bullington / Carol Stapper7-6, 6-0
2025-10-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Davis / Mimi Smith vs Ellen Sharan / Donna Sullivan6-4, 6-4
2025-10-06vs Wynlakes StapperWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Harvey / Jenny Kimel vs Laura McLemore / Cheryl Martin6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatie Gerst / Sandra Putz vs Nora Cammack / Susan Veres6-0, 6-1
2025-09-22vs Wynlakes TelehanyWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenni Payne / Shelia Walker vs Diane Locke / Lisa Zanglin6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Ernest / Laura Harvey vs Julie Brand / DEBBY THOMAS6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-15vs Wynlakes StapperWon 10
W#1 DoublesMimi Smith / Jenni Payne vs Leah Leal / Lisa Eley6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Fall USTA 55 & Over Day League - Montgomery have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Leslie Davis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Sandra Putz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Shelia Walker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Mimi Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Jenny Kimel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Jenni Payne
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.73
Jennifer Davis
published 4
3.72
Barbara Ernest
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Katie Gerst
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.54
Ann Osten
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.53
Ethel Holladay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelia Walker + Jenny Kimel7060% games+7.8% vs expected
Jennifer Davis + Jenni Payne4256% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Davis + Mimi Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Davis
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Sandra Putz
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Shelia Walker
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Mimi Smith
31W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Jenny Kimel
38W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Jenni Payne
39W–17L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Jennifer Davis
66W–70L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Barbara Ernest
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Katie Gerst
33W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
4
Ann Osten
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Ethel Holladay
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.