Teams

HCC - A. Giang

2023 Hillsborough Tri-Level · 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-26vs Sun City - L. GreenleeLost 02
L#2 DoublesRebecca Evangelista / Irene Arias Gutierrez vs Linda Bacon / Laura Mester6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Dempsey / Caralyn Paul vs Melody Smith / Helene Kennedy-Peterson4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAndrea Fajardo / Sonia Patrick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmber Morgenstern / Irene Arias Gutierrez vs Dillon Yost / Alize Uyttenhove Farhat3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Hare / Laura Dempsey vs Matura Suksai / Samantha Romasiewicz2-6, 2-6
2023-07-29vs Sun City - L. GreenleeWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Fajardo / Sonia Patrick vs Paige Lowery-Haggbloom / Susan Williams2-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Martinez / Michelle Hare vs Kathleen Rossman / Debbie Zieg5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNatalie Martinez / Caralyn Paul vs Kami Barnes / Tiffany Garner6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-08vs Sun City - L. GreenleeWon 20
W#2 DoublesIrene Arias Gutierrez / Rebecca Evangelista vs Edna Carlin / Kathleen Rossman6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNatalie Martinez / Michelle Hare vs Melody Smith / Debbie Zieg6-0, 7-6
W#1 DoublesLaura Dempsey / Michelle Hare vs Breezy Paulus / Kenzier McIntyre7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Angie Jones
published 4.5
Asbel Giang
published 4.5
4.16
Sonia Patrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Andrea Fajardo
published 4.5
3.92
3.85
Irene Arias Gutierrez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.61
Caralyn Paul
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Maria Yulee Guim
published
3.13
Michelle Hare
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Evangelista + Sonia Patrick3450% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Evangelista + Irene Arias Gutierrez314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Jones
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
4.37
4.5
Asbel Giang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Sonia Patrick
95W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Andrea Fajardo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Rebecca Evangelista
113W–52L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Irene Arias Gutierrez
65W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Caralyn Paul
289W–165L career · 6 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Maria Yulee Guim
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
Michelle Hare
101W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.