Teams

Whack WAC

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.5 WD

14 players · average NTRP 4.28 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Maggie Dudeck
published
4.43
Angela Caldwell
published 4.5
4.18
Brooke Gabbey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.17
Sandy Eicher
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.14
Breanne Hesseltine
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Christa Nonnemaker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Tanja Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Lori Constan
published
3.77
Susana Zak
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
3.72
Claudine Stanley
published 4
3.64
Ramona Halloran
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
Joyce Stickney
published
Kelsey Mckinnon
published
Parise Livanos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanja Daniel + Christa Nonnemaker2947% games−1.4% vs expected
Sandy Eicher + Christa Nonnemaker111947% games−2.3% vs expected
Ramona Halloran + Tanja Daniel182649% games−4.2% vs expected
Christa Nonnemaker + Brooke Gabbey9750% gamesnot enough data
Tanja Daniel + Susana Zak2642% gamesnot enough data
Breanne Hesseltine + Sandy Eicher4355% gamesnot enough data
Tanja Daniel + Sandy Eicher1439% gamesnot enough data
Tanja Daniel + Brooke Gabbey2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Dudeck
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.56
4.5
Angela Caldwell
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Brooke Gabbey
98W–87L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Sandy Eicher
29W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
4.17
4.5
Breanne Hesseltine
23W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Christa Nonnemaker
64W–89L career · 6 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Tanja Daniel
148W–174L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Lori Constan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Susana Zak
17W–32L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Claudine Stanley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Ramona Halloran
90W–100L career · 11 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
Joyce Stickney
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelsey Mckinnon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Parise Livanos
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.