Teams

Fall Winners - Quail West - C.Hayes

2023 Collier Adult 18 & Over Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.94 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-08vs Cambier - CodreySplit 11
L#2 DoublesEmeric Robert / James Foley vs Owen Wilson / Shep Burr3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesGary Dellovade vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-12-01vs Cambier - PackoWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharles Hayes / James Foley vs David Crisp / John Franta7-5, 6-2
2022-11-30vs Heritage Bay - McWatersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Foley / Robert Crews vs Joe Hogan / Kevin Wilson1-6, 2-6
2022-11-17vs Riverstone - MarchandWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Foley / Gary Dellovade vs Colin O'Higgins / David Townsley6-4, 6-3
2022-11-03vs Marco YMCA - BreshinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Foley / Robert Crews vs Joseph Kardek / David Ray6-3, 6-3
2022-10-27vs Cambier - CodreyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Foley / Fernando Darder vs Garrett Carney / Greg Donahue6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-10-20vs Cambier - PackoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Foley / Fernando Darder vs Tyler Wood / John Franta7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Andy Jhanji
published 4
3.93
Andrzej Marcisz
published 4
3.93
Fred Weinman
published 4
3.91
Thomas Stefaniuk
published
3.82
Dan Scardino
published 4
3.79
Gary Dellovade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.76
James Foley
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Fernando Darder
published 4
3.58
Charles Hayes
published 4
3.31
Emeric Robert
published 3.5
Robert Crews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Jhanji + Fred Weinman14361% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andy Jhanji
26W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Andrzej Marcisz
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Fred Weinman
21W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.93
Thomas Stefaniuk
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Dan Scardino
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Gary Dellovade
82W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
4
James Foley
126W–72L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Fernando Darder
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Charles Hayes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Emeric Robert
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Michael Mullenmeister
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Crews
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.