Teams

Cambier - Packo

2023 Collier Adult 18 & Over Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-15vs Heritage Bay - McWatersLost 01
L#1 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Gabriel Castellano2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-12-08vs Marco YMCA - BreshinWon 20
W#1 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Bryan Fowler6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJohn Healy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Robert Crews6-7, 6-7
2022-11-22vs Riverstone - MarchandWon 10
W#2 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Scott Monette6-4, 6-3
2022-11-17Lost 01
L#1 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Markus Rinderer3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-11-03vs Heritage Bay - McWatersLost 01
L#2 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Dana Mcilwain3-6, 1-6
2022-10-27vs Marco YMCA - BreshinWon 10
W#1 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Jim Halpin6-4, 6-1
2022-10-20Lost 01
L#2 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Rob Fox6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Grant Packo
published 4.5
3.90
Zoltan Seles
published
3.65
Tyler Wood
published
3.59
William Watkins
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.38
Ian Mock
published 4
3.36
John Franta
published
3.35
Scott Wagner
published
3.17
David Packo
published 3.5
3.15
David Crisp
published 3.5
2.73
John Healy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Martin Gilvarg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Wood + Zoltan Seles3844% games−3.0% vs expected
Martin Gilvarg + John Franta224 matchesnot enough data
David Packo + Tyler Wood033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Grant Packo
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.96
Zoltan Seles
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
Tyler Wood
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
William Watkins
13W–26L career · 8 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Ian Mock
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.38
John Franta
30W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
Scott Wagner
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
David Packo
11W–26L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
David Crisp
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
John Healy
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
>99%<1%0%
2.73
Martin Gilvarg
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.