Teams

High Point/Tucker W3.5

2022 DTA 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
3.30
Hilary Nagel
published 3.5
3.27
Tricia Ehrisman
published
3.13
Celeste Schmidt
published 3.5
3.10
Shari Nederhoff
published
3.07
Kelly Lilley
published
2.93
Kristen Fenner
published
2.86
Christy Key
published 3
2.84
Cathy Childress
published 3
Julie McCown
published
Kim McClain
published
Ruth Robbins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Schmidt + Tricia Ehrisman314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lilley + Shari Nederhoff213 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Ehrisman + Ruth Robbins033 matchesnot enough data
Shari Nederhoff + MARNI WISE - ITSCOVITCH123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MARNI WISE - ITSCOVITCH
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Hilary Nagel
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Tricia Ehrisman
15W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Celeste Schmidt
19W–14L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Shari Nederhoff
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kelly Lilley
27W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
Kristen Fenner
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Christy Key
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Cathy Childress
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.84
Julie McCown
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim McClain
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruth Robbins
11W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.