Teams

Thomas-Woods/18/2.5/CWN/CTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 Shrev

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs Holt-Day/18/2.5/CWN/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCrystal Robinson / Alison Taylor vs Kirsten Day / Angela Pharr6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErica Savannah / Brittany Willis vs Aimee Ross / Sundi Littleton4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShea Thomas / Nichelle Grimes vs Allison Goins / Jill Braniff5-7, 1-6
2026-08-19vs Dupree/18/2.5/CWN/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesErica Savannah / Shea Thomas vs Melanie Auchard / Haley Poole2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJasmine Woods / Darlene Alexander vs Georgie Sutton / Michelle Josting0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNichelle Grimes / Brittany Willis vs Bridget Dupree / Monica Helm2-6, 3-6
2026-08-12vs McWilliams/18/2.5/CWN/QTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesErica Savannah / Crystal Robinson vs Bonnie Haynes / Tiffany Wright6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlison Taylor / Beverly Miles vs Vikki Mclain / Sara Whetstone6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJasmine Woods / Marilyn Myers vs Deann Mcneil / Lacie Campbell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Crystal Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Beverly Miles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Darlene Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Marilyn Myers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.92
Jasmine Woods
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.87
Alison Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.84
Erica Savannah
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.68
Nichelle Grimes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jasmine Woods + Alison Taylor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Crystal Robinson
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.53
2.5
Beverly Miles
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Darlene Alexander
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Marilyn Myers
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Jasmine Woods
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
2.5
Alison Taylor
4W–13L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
2.5
Erica Savannah
5W–13L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Nichelle Grimes
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.