Teams

UPTA18A/Hughes/GCC

2025 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Women - 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-09vs UPTA18A/Benson/ThornbladeWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Siler / Lauren Barber vs Melissa Bailey / Amy Kimbell6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHolly Sellers vs Kelly Fischer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Lane Louie / Elizabeth Rasor vs Rachael Benson / Rebecca Norris6-0, 6-0
2025-05-08vs UPTA18A/Yellachich/SportsclubWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Boyd / Virginia Hayes vs Ashley Yellachich / Madelaine Jones6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Schipper vs Marleny Bane6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBlythe Hughes / Elizabeth Rasor vs Jane Byrne / Victoria Brioc7-5, 4-1
2025-05-02vs UPTA18A/Neil/River WalkLost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Barber / Jessica Siler vs Michelle Callahan / Lauren Young6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Sellers vs Lucie Bujetova Sliva3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Lane Louie / Ashley Boyd vs Jessa Shiner / Janna Neil6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-04vs UPTA18A/Austin/Keowee KeyWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Sellers / Lauren Barber vs Sherry Blaha / Denise Aylor6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJessica Siler vs Karen Volk6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLacey Morgan / Teresa Webster vs Cindy Register / Cathy Nance3-6, 1-6
2025-03-28vs UPTA18A/Howard/KrocWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Barber / Jessica Siler vs Heather Ware / Caroline Smoak6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHolly Sellers vs Mary Duff Rayneri6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristen McLean / Laura Lane Louie vs Blake Brookshire / Virginia Pettigrew6-0, 6-0
2025-03-14vs UPTA18A/Corley/PavilionLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica Siler / Ashley Boyd vs Bronwen Greene / Melissa Studebaker4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHolly Sellers vs Brandi Bradbrook6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAllison Ko / Virginia Hayes vs Maryn Canniff / Anne Henry2-6, 2-6
2025-03-07vs UPTA18A/Scott/BrookstoneLost 12
L#1 DoublesLacey Morgan / Allison Ko vs Sunny Davis / Anna Leavitt5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Schipper vs Ashley Popham4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBlythe Hughes / Mary Gossage vs Janeen Doyle / Kelley Golden6-3, 6-3
2025-02-28vs UPTA18A/Belflower/Sugar CreekWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Rasor / Ashley Boyd vs Sara Fox / Kristy Wingerter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaura Lane Louie vs Jami Huguet6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSarah Schipper / Mary Gossage vs Shelley Boozer / Lynn Pascazio6-4, 7-6
2025-02-21vs UPTA18A/Halliday-Hucks/EmbassyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLacey Morgan / Virginia Hayes vs Sarah Hansen / Madina Cauthen1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Siler vs Kristen Benton6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Rasor / Teresa Webster vs Ashley Hill / Heather Young4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Women - 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Lauren Barber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.60
Holly Sellers
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
2.58
Jessica Siler
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.36
Laura Lane Louie
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.25
Blythe Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.20
Sarah Schipper
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.11
Kristen McLean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Teresa Webster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Virginia Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.78
Lacey Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Rasor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Gossage
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Sellers + Lauren Barber4355% games+7.3% vs expected
Virginia Hayes + Kristen McLean1436% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Barber + Jessica Siler5061% gamesnot enough data
Holly Sellers + Jessica Siler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Barber
15W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Holly Sellers
32W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
Jessica Siler
21W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Laura Lane Louie
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
3
Blythe Hughes
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.25
Sarah Schipper
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.20
Kristen McLean
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Teresa Webster
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Virginia Hayes
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Lacey Morgan
1W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Elizabeth Rasor
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Gossage
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.