Teams

UPTA18A/Halliday-Hucks/Embassy

2025 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Women - 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-05vs UPTA18A/Benson/ThornbladeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMadina Cauthen / Sarah Hansen vs Deidre LaVigne / Ashley Slagel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Halliday vs Lauren Winchester6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAshley Hill / Melissa Hucks vs Kelli Reinstein / Collins Reingardt7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-02vs UPTA18A/Howard/KrocLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hucks / Laura Halliday vs Joy Howard / Caroline Smoak2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMadina Cauthen vs Miller Howard6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Bright / Heather Young vs Heather Ware / Sarah DAndrea4-6, 1-6
2025-04-30vs UPTA18A/Corley/PavilionLost 12
W#1 DoublesMadina Cauthen / Natallia Sianko vs Shellie Corley / Maryteal Oneal6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLaura Halliday vs Becca Wilson0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Hill / Heather Young vs Maryn Canniff / Melissa Studebaker4-6, 2-6
2025-04-11vs UPTA18A/Scott/BrookstoneLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hucks / Madina Cauthen vs Kelley Golden / Trish Scott2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNatallia Sianko vs Ashley Popham6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLaura Halliday / Heather Young vs Sunny Davis / Andrea Craft4-6, 5-7
2025-04-04vs UPTA18A/Belflower/Sugar CreekLost 12
L#1 DoublesMadina Cauthen / Diane Bright vs Tricia Parker / Shelley Boozer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAshley Hill vs Kristen Belflower6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMelissa Hucks / Shannon Wydman vs Jami Huguet / Lynn Pascazio1-6, 0-6
2025-03-28vs UPTA18A/Austin/Keowee KeyWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatallia Sianko / Melissa Hucks vs Alexandra Hazlett / Susan Schneider6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMadina Cauthen vs Carol Austin6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Halliday / Sarah Hansen vs Cathy Nance / Sherry Blaha2-6, 2-6
2025-03-14vs UPTA18A/Neil/River WalkLost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Wydman / Kristen Benton vs Lauren Young / Michelle Callahan4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Hansen vs Meg Powers1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Hill / Laura Halliday vs Jessa Shiner / Janna Neil1-6, 1-6
2025-03-07vs UPTA18A/Yellachich/SportsclubWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadina Cauthen / Melissa Hucks vs Ashley Yellachich / Madelaine Jones6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDiane Bright vs Marleny Bane6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Hill / Shannon Wydman vs Jane Byrne / Emily Byrne7-6, 6-2
2025-02-21vs UPTA18A/Hughes/GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Hansen / Madina Cauthen vs Lacey Morgan / Virginia Hayes6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKristen Benton vs Jessica Siler4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Hill / Heather Young vs Elizabeth Rasor / Teresa Webster6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Women - 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Natallia Sianko
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Madina Cauthen
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.54
Ashley Hill
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.25
Sarah Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.21
Melissa Hucks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.07
Diane Bright
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Kristen Benton
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Halliday
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Shannon Wydman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madina Cauthen + Natallia Sianko404 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Hucks + Laura Halliday044 matchesnot enough data
Madina Cauthen + Sarah Hansen213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Hucks + Ashley Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natallia Sianko
22W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.83
Madina Cauthen
34W–42L career · 12 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Ashley Hill
16W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
Sarah Hansen
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Melissa Hucks
9W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Diane Bright
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Kristen Benton
3W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Halliday
1W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Wydman
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.