Teams

Team Challengers

2023 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-02vs Play it Forward 18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Bokel / James Ledbetter vs Stephen Gotts / Mario Olivero-Cabrera4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTom Do / Ryan Poole vs Jarrett Ray / Jonathan Ramseur1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Wolosuk / James Rentsch vs Max White / Josh Snead0-6, 2-6
2023-05-23vs Team WolvesLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Bokel / Frank Pan vs Jay Colella / Frank Wang2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs Jason Ye3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTom Do / Ryan Poole vs Kai Yu / Luo Dong6-3, 6-3
2023-05-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlex Banciu / Samuel Fontanez vs Henock Kebede / Paul Joseph3-6, 4-6
2023-05-13vs Team WGCCLost 01
L#2 SinglesJames Rentsch vs Robert Whitney4-6, 4-6
2023-05-06vs Arlington Aces VILost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Do / Matthew Troutman vs Brandon Wales / John Herne3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-02vs TEAM88Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSamuel Fontanez / Ramon Mercado vs Anh Nguyen / Warren Chen4-6, 4-6
2023-04-13vs Team RJT M3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEx Pow-Anpongkul / James Rentsch vs Arvind Jairam / Robert Dougherty1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Samuel Tanner
published
3.56
Chris Bokel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Ugbede Abu
published
3.37
Ryan Poole
published
3.36
Faizan Mumtaz
published
3.34
Tom Do
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Samuel Fontanez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Carlo Pizarro
published 3.5
3.19
Anup Dandekar
published 3.5
3.06
Frank Pan
published
2.73
James Rentsch
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Ex Pow-Anpongkul
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samuel Tanner
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Chris Bokel
83W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
Ugbede Abu
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
Ryan Poole
27W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Faizan Mumtaz
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Tom Do
37W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Samuel Fontanez
71W–101L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Carlo Pizarro
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Anup Dandekar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Frank Pan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
James Rentsch
67W–98L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Ex Pow-Anpongkul
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.