Teams

Tri Q

2025 Tri Level · Tri Level Bozeman Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.89 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-16vs MT/LARSON/TRILEVEL/W3.5/4.0/4.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Peck / Michelle Varda vs Joanne Sposito / Emma Larson3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKari Keogh / Mariafe Ponce vs Elizabeth Lund / Hannah Shirkey3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMary Wagner / Tina Ovnic vs Natalie Van Dusen / Kayti Lausch2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-15vs MT/LARSON/TRILEVEL/W3.5/4.0/4.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Hier / Kari Keogh vs Emma Larson / Joanne Sposito7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMariafe Ponce / Elizabeth Matthews vs Melanie Mudge / Hannah Shirkey0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Wagner / Diana Saros vs Kayti Lausch / Susie Boyer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-10vs MT/LARSON/TRILEVEL/W3.5/4.0/4.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Peck / Michelle Varda vs Emma Larson / Joanne Sposito3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKari Keogh / Mariafe Ponce vs Elizabeth Lund / Melanie Mudge5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTina Ovnic / Mary Wagner vs Natalie Van Dusen / Michelle Grocke6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-09vs MT/LARSON/TRILEVEL/W3.5/4.0/4.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Peck / Andrea Hier vs Joanne Sposito / Morgan Daley0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMariafe Ponce / Kari Keogh vs Elizabeth Lund / Hannah Shirkey6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Ridgway / Diana Saros vs Natalie Van Dusen / Susie Boyer4-6, 3-3
2025-08-08vs MT/LARSON/TRILEVEL/W3.5/4.0/4.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Hier / Lauren Peck vs Emma Larson / Morgan Daley5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Matthews / Mariafe Ponce vs Melanie Mudge / Hannah Shirkey3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Saros / Emily Ridgway vs Susie Boyer / Michelle Grocke0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri Level Bozeman Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Lauren Peck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Kari Keogh
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Andrea Hier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Mariafe Ponce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Elizabeth Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Mary Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Tina Ovnic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Emily Ridgway
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Diana Saros
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Michelle Varda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Ovnic + Mary Wagner6849% games−1.8% vs expected
Diana Saros + Emily Ridgway3346% games−3.3% vs expected
Kari Keogh + Mariafe Ponce2344% games−4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lauren Peck
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Kari Keogh
33W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Andrea Hier
33W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4
Mariafe Ponce
30W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Elizabeth Matthews
18W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Mary Wagner
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Tina Ovnic
34W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Emily Ridgway
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Diana Saros
22W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
Michelle Varda
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.