Teams

T2 - Creighton Farms/ Norman

2022 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-13vs Some Strings Attached - BixlerLost 01
L#1 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Nancy Sicairos1-6, 0-6
2022-05-31vs T1- R.Creek/ MarpleWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Mccarter / Teresa Smith vs Carthina Marple / Leanne Smith7-5, 6-0
2022-05-25vs I'd Hit That - ChangLost 01
L#1 DoublesBritney Beauchemin / Afsoun Semsar vs Celeste Linthicum / Amy Albanese1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-20vs Some Strings Attached - BixlerLost 01
L#1 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Ursula Cox1-6, 1-6
2022-05-09vs T1- R.Creek/ MarpleWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Mccarter / Hannah Auyang vs Joy Moynihan / Julianne Nitta6-0, 6-3
2022-05-03vs I'd Hit That - ChangLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Mccarter / Ella Rash vs Linda Chestnut / Cheryl Phillips4-6, 2-6
2022-04-25vs Some Strings Attached - BixlerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Mccarter / Tamara Hurney vs Ursula Cox / Jennifer Leibold1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Amber Wooten6-0, 6-0
2022-04-04vs T1- R.Creek/ MarpleWon 10
W#1 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Carey Mottet6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Carolyn Mccarter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Hannah Auyang
published 3.5
3.13
Afsoun Semsar
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Kerry Guaglianone
published
2.89
Rebecca Norman
published
2.64
Maggie Clegg
published
2.44
Britney Beauchemin
published 2.5
2.36
Ella Rash
published 2.5
2.18
Rebecca McDonald
published
2.14
Tamara Hurney
published
Jennie Simpson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolyn Mccarter
89W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Hannah Auyang
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3
Afsoun Semsar
44W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%15%85%
3.13
Kerry Guaglianone
21W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Rebecca Norman
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
Maggie Clegg
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
2.5
Britney Beauchemin
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Ella Rash
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%86%14%
2.36
Rebecca McDonald
9W–24L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.18
Tamara Hurney
3W–15L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Jennie Simpson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.