Teams

PDavis2-DUR

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 2.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-11-20vs EMcMurtrey-DURLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Erin McMurtrey4-6, 0-4
2025-11-19vs EPatulski2-DURLost 01
L#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Sophia Ewing1-6, 2-6
2025-11-13vs JHarrell-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Jody Schulze6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-12vs APerry-HVCCWon 10
W#3 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Maria Behan6-3, 6-2
2025-11-12vs CFong-DURWon 10
W#1 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Elizabeth Haderer6-4, 2-0
2025-11-05vs EPatulski2-DURWon 20
W#2 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Emily Patulski6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Ni Zhang6-1, 6-4
2025-11-04vs JHarrell-DURWon 10
W#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Jasmine Hemmings6-3, 6-0
2025-11-03vs EPatulski2-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Emily Patulski6-7, 4-6
2025-10-22vs CFong-DURWon 10
W#2 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Elizabeth Haderer6-3, 6-1
2025-10-22Lost 01
L#2 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Morgan Parker0-6, 1-6
2025-10-15Won 10
W#2 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Laura Cannon6-2, 6-2
2025-10-15vs APerry-HVCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Meg Williamson6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Caroline Sloan
published 3
2.72
Carin von Kahr
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.59
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3
2.57
Kellie Johnson
published
2.54
Susanne Schmal
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.31
Virginia Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Howell-Davis + Carin von Kahr4157% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Howell-Davis + Susanne Schmal303 matchesnot enough data
Carin von Kahr + Susanne Schmal303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Sloan
30W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.17
3
Carin von Kahr
43W–63L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
120W–146L career · 10 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Kellie Johnson
18W–24L career · no lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
2.5
Susanne Schmal
61W–43L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
Virginia Wang
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.