Teams

EPatulski2-DUR

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 2.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-19vs CFong-DURLost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Patulski vs Sophia Anderson2-6, 3-6
2025-11-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Patulski vs Jane Stewart6-0, 6-1
2025-11-13vs JHarrell-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesHannah Gahagan vs Jody Schulze6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAmy Singer vs Jasmine Hemmings6-0, 6-1
2025-11-12vs EMcMurtrey-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Patulski vs Erin McMurtrey1-6, 0-6
2025-11-05vs PDavis2-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Patulski vs Carin von Kahr2-6, 4-6
2025-11-03vs PDavis2-DURWon 10
W#2 SinglesEmily Patulski vs Pamela Howell-Davis7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Sophia Ewing
published
2.65
Hannah Gahagan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.56
Emily Patulski
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.54
Amy Singer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.46
Sina Mathew
published
1.94
Donnetta Hanson
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Ewing
33W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.78
2.5
Hannah Gahagan
18W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%12%88%
2.65
2.5
Emily Patulski
39W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.56
2.5
Amy Singer
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
Sina Mathew
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
2.5
Donnetta Hanson
3W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.