Teams

Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Cook

Spring USTA Central Indiana Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 7.0 Women, W

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-30vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCD MelcherLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Parks / Kay Taylor vs Lucy Lane / Paula Deemer3-6, 3-6
2026-05-16vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCD PruittLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Kaiser / Dawn Parks vs Vicki Valandra / Beth Whitsett1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKay Taylor / Annette Kreider vs Kathleen Golightly / Stephanie Martin0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPam Baxter / Linda Cook vs Kikuko Campbell / Belinda Strobel6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-02vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCE AkersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Kaiser / Catherine Taylor vs Ann Osuntokun / Lorinne Banister3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Kreider / Teresa Berg vs Debbie Barnes / Susan Akers1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLori Schumacher / Harpriya Bhagar vs Marci Williams / Lisa Beck0-6, 0-6
2026-04-25vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCD DaltonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJackie Kaiser / Catherine Taylor vs Jackie Clark / Shannon Ulrich2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnnette Kreider / Harpriya Bhagar vs Mary Beth Servie / Hewook Lee1-6, 1-6
2026-04-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCorri Brooks / Brenda Evans vs Michelle Bergren / Tammy Neal4-6, 4-6
2026-04-11vs Indy A55 7.0W IND AckermanWon 21
L#1 DoublesJackie Kaiser / Catherine Taylor vs Darci Ackerman / Lori McPike0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Parks / Corri Brooks vs Leyna Mulholland / Cynthia Rathjen6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHarpriya Bhagar / Lori Schumacher vs Tracy Stafford / Chahrzad Montrose7-6, 6-4
2026-03-28vs Indy A55 7.0W IRCD HalleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnette Kreider / Kay Taylor vs Julie Burns / Jacqueline Bartelt4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Berg / Corri Brooks vs Angela Davis / Kathy Collins4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLori Schumacher / Brenda Evans vs Cyndee McFerran / Karen Halle1-6, 3-6
2026-03-21vs Indy A55 7.0W CRC NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Kaiser / Dawn Parks vs Myra Endris / Ann Meunier6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPam Baxter / Teresa Berg vs Marcy Molter / Jackie Hudnall3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristy Lombardo / Harpriya Bhagar vs Jennifer Crouter-Clouse / Julie Dunscomb3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · CIN Indy 55 & Over 7.0 Women, W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Pruitt8020412149
2Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Dalton7118618179
3Indy A55 7.0W IRCE Akers53141020166
4Indy A55 7.0W CRC Nelson53141026209
5Indy A55 7.0W MRC Vorhees4415921176
6Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Halle35101429218
7Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Melcher3591533235
8Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Cook1732143279
9Indy A55 7.0W IND Ackerman0851939255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Pam Baxter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Jackie Kaiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Dawn Parks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.81
Corri Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brenda Evans
published 3
2.67
Lori Schumacher
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.65
Annette Kreider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Harpriya Bhagar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Cook
published
Teresa Berg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Parks + Annette Kreider3639% games−0.3% vs expected
Dawn Parks + Jackie Kaiser1438% games−1.9% vs expected
Linda Cook + Jackie Kaiser0626% games−14.0% vs expected
Pam Baxter + Dawn Parks0534% gamesnot enough data
Linda Cook + Dawn Parks224 matchesnot enough data
Pam Baxter + Annette Kreider044 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Parks + Brenda Evans044 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Parks + Corri Brooks224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Baxter
26W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jackie Kaiser
37W–93L career · 5 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
3.5
Dawn Parks
44W–95L career · 4 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Corri Brooks
20W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Brenda Evans
8W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Schumacher
132W–110L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Annette Kreider
40W–93L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Harpriya Bhagar
16W–88L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.64
Linda Cook
56W–127L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Berg
22W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.